Positive Week for Samsonite International S.A. (HKG:1910) Institutional Investors Who Lost 18% Over the Past Year
Positive Week for Samsonite International S.A. (HKG:1910) Institutional Investors Who Lost 18% Over the Past Year
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Samsonite International implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 机构在新秀丽国际的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价有着重要影响
- 总共有11家投资者拥有该公司52%的所有权
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。
If you want to know who really controls Samsonite International S.A. (HKG:1910), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 74% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解谁真正控制着Samsonite International S.A.(HKG:1910),那么您必须看公司股东注册表的构成。持有公司股份数量最多的群体,准确地说占了大约74%,是机构。换句话说,这个群体将从他们投资公司中获得最多(或者失去最多)的利益。
Institutional investors would appreciate the 5.9% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 18%.
机构投资者将会对上周股价上涨5.9%表示赞赏,因为他们一年的损失总计令人失望的18%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Samsonite International, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究Samsonite International每一类所有者,首先从以下图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Samsonite International?
机构所有权告诉我们关于Samsonite International的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Samsonite International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Samsonite International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到Samsonite International确实拥有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的很大一部分。这意味着那些机构的分析师已经看过这支股票,而且他们喜欢它。但就像其他任何人一样,他们也可能错了。当多家机构拥有一支股票时,就会存在一种风险,即它们会形成‘拥挤交易’。当这样的交易失败时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以查看下面Samsonite International的历史收入和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更多。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Samsonite International. The company's largest shareholder is E Fund Management Co., Ltd., with ownership of 9.5%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.2% and 6.0% of the stock.
机构投资者拥有超过公司50%的股份,因此他们可能共同对董事会决定产生强烈影响。对新秀丽国际来说,对冲基金并不持有太多股份。该公司最大的股东是易方达基金管理有限公司,持股比例为9.5%。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有约6.2%和6.0%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 52% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔细地观察我们的所有权数据可以发现,前11大股东持有公司的52%股份,意味着没有单一股东持有大部分股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Samsonite International
新秀丽国际的内部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Samsonite International S.A.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around HK$1.2b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们可以报告,内部人确实拥有新秀丽国际S.A.的股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在的明显联盟通常是积极的。在这种情况下,他们持有价值约12亿港元的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到内部人员有这种投资水平是件好事。您可以在这里检查,看看这些内部人员最近是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Samsonite International. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众拥有21%的股权,主要由个人投资者组成,对新秀丽国际有一定程度的影响力。尽管拥有的股权规模相当可观,但这可能不足以改变公司政策,如果决定与其他大股东不一致的话。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Samsonite International .
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。为此,您应该注意我们发现的新秀丽国际存在的2个警示信号。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。