share_log

With 5.3% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Ambarella, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AMBA) 7.7% Stock Price Decline

With 5.3% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Ambarella, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AMBA) 7.7% Stock Price Decline

一年来回报率为5.3%,机构所有者可能会忽略纳斯达克公司Ambarella,Inc.(纳斯达克:AMBA)7.7%的股价下跌
Simply Wall St ·  11/17 08:29

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Ambarella's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 考虑到机构在股票中持有大量股份,安霸的股价可能会受到它们的交易决策的影响
  • 业务的51%由前15名股东持有。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

If you want to know who really controls Ambarella, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMBA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果想了解真正控制安霸公司(纳斯达克:AMBA)的是谁,那么你需要看看其股东登记册的构成。机构持有83%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群体。也就是说,如果股价上涨,这个群体将获益最多(如果发生下跌,则损失最大)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$196m last week. However, the 5.3% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

机构投资者在上周公司市值减少了19600万美元后遭受了最高的损失。然而,一年5.3%的回报率可能有助于缓解他们的整体损失。然而,我们会假设他们将密切关注未来的弱势。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ambarella, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入研究安霸每种所有者的情况,从下面的图表开始。

big
NasdaqGS:AMBA Ownership Breakdown November 17th 2024
纳斯达克资本市场:AMBA所有权拆分 2024年11月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ambarella?

机构持股告诉我们有关安霸的什么信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

Ambarella already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ambarella, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

安霸的股东名册上已经有机构。实际上,他们在公司拥有可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经查看了股票并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错。如果两位大型机构投资者同时尝试卖出一支股票,则看到股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查安霸的过去盈利轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他要考虑的因素。

big
NasdaqGS:AMBA Earnings and Revenue Growth November 17th 2024
纳斯达克GS:安霸2024年11月17日的收益和营业收入增长

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Ambarella is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.4% and 4.7% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Feng-Ming Wang is the owner of 1.8% of the company's shares.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有超过公司一半的股份,因此他们可以集体行使重要影响力。 安霸不是对冲基金所有。 该公司最大的股东是领先集团,拥有11%的股权。 相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约8.4%和4.7%的股份。 此外,CEO王丰明拥有该公司1.8%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

所有者们拥有Compass Diversified 33%的股份,其中主要由个人投资者组成,对Compass Diversified产生了一定的影响。虽然该所有权规模可能不足以在他们的利益之下影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Ambarella

安霸的内部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Ambarella, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$139m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以看到,内部股东拥有安霸公司的股份。 这是一家大公司,因此看到这种程度的一致性是好事。内部股东拥有价值13900万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。大多数人会认为这显示了股东和董事会之间的利益一致性。尽管如此,值得检查一下这些内部股东是否一直在抛售股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

广大公众——包括零售投资者——在公司中拥有11%的持股,因此不能被轻视。虽然这个群体不能决定掌控权,但它确实可以对公司的运营产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Ambarella is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我觉得查看公司的股东是非常有趣的。但要真正获得深入了解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。请注意,在我们的投资分析中,安霸显示出了3个警告信号,你应该知道...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发