Eledon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ELDN) Market Cap Dropped US$57m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 57% Were Hit as Were Institutions
Eledon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ELDN) Market Cap Dropped US$57m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 57% Were Hit as Were Institutions
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Eledon Pharmaceuticals by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 43% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- 20% of Eledon Pharmaceuticals is held by Institutions
- 对Eledon制药的个人投资者拥有重大控制权,这意味着公众在管理和治理相关决策上具有更大的影响力。
- 前25名股东持有43%的业务。
- 20%的Eledon制药股份由机构持有。
Every investor in Eledon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:ELDN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位投资Eledon制药公司(纳斯达克:ELDN)的投资者都应了解最强大的股东群体。而持有最大股份的群体是拥有57%股份的个人投资者。换句话说,该群体在其对公司的投资中,可能获得最多的收益(或损失最多)。
While the holdings of individual investors took a hit after last week's 19% price drop, institutions with their 20% holdings also suffered.
由于上周价格下跌19%,个人投资者的持有股票受到了影响,机构的20%持有也遭受了损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Eledon Pharmaceuticals.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Eledon制药的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Eledon Pharmaceuticals?
机构持股情况对Eledon Pharmaceuticals意味着什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Eledon Pharmaceuticals does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Eledon Pharmaceuticals' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到Eledon制药确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的一部分。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉。然而,最好小心依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会犯错。如果多家机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,您可能会看到股票价格迅速下跌。因此,值得关注以下Eledon制药的盈利历史。当然,未来才是最重要的。
It would appear that 11% of Eledon Pharmaceuticals shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Our data shows that BVF Partners L.P. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are RA Capital Management, L.P. and Frazier Life Sciences Management, LP, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 6.0%.
显然,11%的Eledon制药公司股份由对冲基金控制。这一点值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是活跃的投资者,可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期看到创造价值(以及更高的股价)。我们的数据显示,BVF Partners L.P.是最大的股东,拥有11%的流通股份。第二和第三大股东分别是RA Capital Management, L.P.和Frazier Life Sciences Management, LP,他们的股份相同,都是6.0%。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of Eledon Pharmaceuticals
Eledon制药的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that Eledon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It has a market capitalization of just US$239m, and the board has only US$103k worth of shares in their own names. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.
我们的信息显示,Eledon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 的内部人士持有该公司不到1%的股份。 其市场资本化仅为23900万美金,董事会仅持有10.3万美元的股票。 许多人更倾向于看到控股更大的董事会。 一个好的下一步可能是查看这个关于内部买卖的免费总结。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 57% of Eledon Pharmaceuticals. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
公众——包括散户投资者——持有Eledon Pharmaceuticals 57%的股份。 这种规模的持股赋予了普通投资者一些集体力量。 他们可以并且可能会影响行政薪酬、股息政策和拟议的业务收购的决策。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
Private equity firms hold a 12% stake in Eledon Pharmaceuticals. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
股权投资公司持有Eledon制药12%的股份。这表明他们在关键政策决策中可能具有影响力。一些投资者可能会因此受到鼓励,因为股权投资有时能够促进帮助市场看到公司价值的策略。另一方面,那些持有者可能在公司上市后退出了投资。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Eledon Pharmaceuticals (3 are concerning) that you should be aware of.
我发现研究公司究竟由谁拥有非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经识别出Eledon制药的5个警告信号(其中3个令人担忧),您应当注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。