share_log

Chasen Holdings' (SGX:5NV) Shareholders Should Assess Earnings With Caution

Chasen Holdings' (SGX:5NV) Shareholders Should Assess Earnings With Caution

佳晟控股(新加坡交易所:5NV)的股东应谨慎评估收益
Simply Wall St ·  11/18 17:13

Even though Chasen Holdings Limited (SGX:5NV) posted strong earnings recently, the stock hasn't reacted in a large way. We decided to have a deeper look, and we believe that investors might be worried about several concerning factors that we found.

尽管查森控股有限公司(新加坡证券交易所股票代码:5NV)最近公布了强劲的收益,但该股的反应并不大。我们决定进行更深入的研究,我们认为投资者可能会担心我们发现的几个令人担忧的因素。

big
SGX:5NV Earnings and Revenue History November 18th 2024
新加坡证券交易所:5NV 收益和收入历史记录 2024 年 11 月 18 日

A Closer Look At Chasen Holdings' Earnings

仔细研究Chasen Holdings的收益

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

在高级财务中,用于衡量公司将报告的利润转换为自由现金流(FCF)的关键比率是应计比率(来自现金流)。应计比率从给定时期的利润中减去FCF,然后将结果除以该时间内公司的平均运营资产。该比率向我们显示了公司的利润超过其FCF的程度。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

这意味着负应计比率是一件好事,因为它表明该公司带来的自由现金流超出了其利润所暗示的范围。尽管应计比率为正(表明非现金利润达到一定水平)不是问题,但高应计比率可以说是一件坏事,因为它表明纸质利润与现金流不匹配。值得注意的是,有一些学术证据表明,总的来说,高应计比率对短期利润来说是个坏兆头。

Over the twelve months to September 2024, Chasen Holdings recorded an accrual ratio of 0.29. Unfortunately, that means its free cash flow was a lot less than its statutory profit, which makes us doubt the utility of profit as a guide. Even though it reported a profit of S$17.8m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through S$14m in the last year. We saw that FCF was S$19m a year ago though, so Chasen Holdings has at least been able to generate positive FCF in the past. Having said that, there is more to the story. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio. The good news for shareholders is that Chasen Holdings' accrual ratio was much better last year, so this year's poor reading might simply be a case of a short term mismatch between profit and FCF. Shareholders should look for improved cashflow relative to profit in the current year, if that is indeed the case.

在截至2024年9月的十二个月中,Chasen Holdings的应计比率为0.29。不幸的是,这意味着其自由现金流远少于其法定利润,这使我们怀疑利润作为指导的效用。尽管该公司报告了1780万新元的利润,但从自由现金流来看,它实际上在去年消耗了1400万新元。但是,我们看到一年前的FCF为1900万新元,因此Chasen Holdings过去至少能够产生正的FCF。话虽如此,故事还有更多。我们可以看到,不寻常的项目影响了其法定利润,从而影响了应计比率。对股东来说,好消息是,Chasen Holdings去年的应计比率要好得多,因此今年的糟糕数据可能只是利润与FCF之间短期不匹配的情况。如果确实如此,股东应寻求在本年度的现金流相对于利润的改善。

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Chasen Holdings.

注意:我们始终建议投资者检查资产负债表的实力。点击此处查看我们对Chasen Holdings的资产负债表分析。

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

不寻常的物品如何影响利润?

Given the accrual ratio, it's not overly surprising that Chasen Holdings' profit was boosted by unusual items worth S$26m in the last twelve months. We can't deny that higher profits generally leave us optimistic, but we'd prefer it if the profit were to be sustainable. When we crunched the numbers on thousands of publicly listed companies, we found that a boost from unusual items in a given year is often not repeated the next year. And that's as you'd expect, given these boosts are described as 'unusual'. Chasen Holdings had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to September 2024. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items are making its statutory profit significantly stronger than it would otherwise be.

考虑到应计比率,在过去十二个月中,价值2600万新元的不寻常项目提振了Chasen Holdings的利润也就不足为奇了。我们不能否认更高的利润通常会让我们感到乐观,但如果利润是可持续的,我们更愿意这样做。当我们计算数千家上市公司的数字时,我们发现,特定年份中不寻常的项目所带来的提振通常不会在第二年重演。这正如你所预料的那样,因为这些增强被描述为 “不寻常”。截至2024年9月,Chasen Holdings从不寻常的项目中获得了相当大的利润。因此,我们可以推测,这些不寻常的物品使其法定利润明显高于原来的水平。

Our Take On Chasen Holdings' Profit Performance

我们对Chasen Holdings盈利表现的看法

Summing up, Chasen Holdings received a nice boost to profit from unusual items, but could not match its paper profit with free cash flow. Considering all this we'd argue Chasen Holdings' profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. If you'd like to know more about Chasen Holdings as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. For example, we've found that Chasen Holdings has 2 warning signs (1 is concerning!) that deserve your attention before going any further with your analysis.

总而言之,Chasen Holdings从不寻常的项目中获得了不错的利润提振,但其纸面利润无法与自由现金流相提并论。考虑到所有这些,我们认为Chasen Holdings的利润可能给人一种对其可持续盈利水平的过于慷慨的印象。如果您想进一步了解Chasen Holdings作为一家企业,请务必了解其面临的任何风险。例如,我们发现 Chasen Holdings 有 2 个警告信号(1 个令人担忧!)在进行进一步分析之前,这值得你注意。

Our examination of Chasen Holdings has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

我们对Chasen Holdings的审查侧重于某些可能使其收益看起来好于实际的因素。而且,在此基础上,我们有些怀疑。但是,还有很多其他方法可以让你对公司的看法。例如,许多人认为高股本回报率是有利的商业经济的标志,而另一些人则喜欢 “关注资金”,寻找内部人士正在买入的股票。因此,你可能希望看到这份拥有高股本回报率的公司的免费集合,或者这份内部所有权高的股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发