Suzhou Sunmun Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300522) Stock Price Dropped 13% Last Week; Retail Investors Would Not Be Happy
Suzhou Sunmun Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300522) Stock Price Dropped 13% Last Week; Retail Investors Would Not Be Happy
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Suzhou Sunmun Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders own 30% of Suzhou Sunmun Technology
- 零售投资者在世名科技中拥有的相当大比例股权表明,他们共同对管理和业务策略有更大的发言权
- 总共有9个投资者持有该公司50%的股权。
- 内部人士拥有世名科技30%的股份
If you want to know who really controls Suzhou Sunmun Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300522), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 49% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道谁真正控制着世名科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300522),那么您将不得不查看其股东名册的构成。我们可以看到,零售投资者在公司中拥有最大比例的股权,达到49%。也就是说,如果股票上涨(或者如果市场出现下行),该团体将获益最多(或者损失最多)。
While insiders who own 30% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥3.8b last week,retail investors took the most losses.
上周市值下降至38亿元人民币后,持有30%股份的内部人士遭受压力,零售投资者蒙受最大损失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Suzhou Sunmun Technology.
在下面的图表中,我们将重点关注苏州世名科技不同的所有权群体。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Suzhou Sunmun Technology?
机构持股缺失对苏州世名科技意味着什么?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
通常,不活跃的小公司缺少机构投资者,但大公司缺少机构投资者则不太常见。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Suzhou Sunmun Technology, for yourself, below.
机构不持有某股票有多种解释。最常见的原因是公司相对于管理的基金规模太小,因此机构无需过多关注该公司。另外,可能是公司的某些特点让机构投资者望而却步。机构投资者可能并不认为公司过去的业务增长令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以在下方看到苏州世名科技过去的营业收入表现。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Suzhou Sunmun Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Shi Ming Lu with 23% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 17% and 2.8% of the stock.
我们注意到对于世名科技,对冲基金并没有意义上的投资。从我们的数据中可以看出,最大的股东是CEO陆仕明,持有23%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有大约17%和2.8%的股票。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
进一步调查发现,超过一半的公司股份由前9大股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被小股东平衡了。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以加深对股票预期表现的全面了解也是一个好习惯。虽然有部分分析师的覆盖,但该公司可能没有受到广泛的关注。因此,在未来可能会受到更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of Suzhou Sunmun Technology
世名科技的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Suzhou Sunmun Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.1b worth of shares in the CN¥3.8b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
看起来内部人拥有苏州世名科技有限公司的大部分股份。内部人在这家38亿元人民币公司中拥有价值11亿元人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以点击这里查看他们是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 49% stake in Suzhou Sunmun Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在苏州世名科技持有49%的股份。尽管这一所有权规模相当可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 21%, of the Suzhou Sunmun Technology stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
世名科技股票的21%由私人公司持有。单凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得查明谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人员或其他相关方通过独立的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。