PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603690) Stock Price Dropped 13% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy
PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603690) Stock Price Dropped 13% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over PNC Process Systems by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 45% ownership
- Insider ownership in PNC Process Systems is 34%
- 个人投资者对至纯科技拥有的显著控制权意味着普通公众拥有更多影响管理和治理决策的权力
- 该公司共有25位投资者,持股比例为45%。
- 至纯科技的内部持股比例为34%
If you want to know who really controls PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603690), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 55% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想了解谁真正控制着至纯科技股份有限公司(SHSE:603690),那么您需要看一下其股权登记的构成。拥有最大股份的是个人投资者,持股比例为55%。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该群体将获益最多(如果出现下行,则损失最大)。
Following a 13% decrease in the stock price last week, individual investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 34% stock also took a hit.
上周股票价格下跌13%,个人投资者遭受了最大损失,但持有34%股份的内部人员也受到了打击。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of PNC Process Systems.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了至纯科技不同所有权群体。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PNC Process Systems?
机构持有权告诉我们有关至纯科技的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
PNC Process Systems already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see PNC Process Systems' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
至纯科技已经有机构在股份登记簿上。事实上,他们在公司中持有一定比例的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经研究过这支股票并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能出错。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总是存在它们在'拥挤交易'中的风险。当这样的交易失败时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到至纯科技的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更多。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in PNC Process Systems. With a 27% stake, CEO Yuan Jiang is the largest shareholder. With 3.3% and 2.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Long Ying Lu and Hao Zhao are the second and third largest shareholders.
我们注意到,对冲基金不持有至纯科技的重大投资。 持有27%股份的CEO袁江是最大的股东。 持有3.3%和2.5%的流通股份,分别是龙英璐和郝钊是第二和第三大股东。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
尽管有必要研究公司的机构持股数据,但研究分析师的情绪也是有道理的,以了解风向。这只股票有一些分析师的覆盖,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵盖面的空间。
Insider Ownership Of PNC Process Systems
至纯科技的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥3.5b stake in this CN¥10b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据显示,内部持有者占据至纯科技有限公司的合理比例。看到内部持有者在这家市值100亿人民币的企业中持有价值人民币35亿的股份非常有趣。大多数人会说,这显示了与股东的良好契合度,尤其是在这种规模的公司中。您可以点击这里查看内部持有者是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 55% of PNC Process Systems shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,共同持有至纯科技股份的55%。这种所有权水平使来自更广泛公众的投资者有一些权力来影响关键政策决策,如董事会构成、高管薪酬和股息支付比例。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for PNC Process Systems (1 is concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
我发现查看公司的股东是非常有趣的。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了至纯科技的 3 条警示信号(其中 1 条令人担忧!),在投资前你应该注意这些。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。