Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd's (SHSE:603668) Last Week's 7.2% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd's (SHSE:603668) Last Week's 7.2% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significant control over Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 42% ownership
- 25% of Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group is held by insiders
- 个人投资者对福建天马科技集团的重大控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
- 共有25名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有42%的所有权
- 内部人士持有福建天马科技集团25%的股份
A look at the shareholders of Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd (SHSE:603668) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 58% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看看福建天马科技集团股份有限公司(SHSE: 603668)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。个人投资者拥有公司的最大股份,拥有58%的股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。
Following a 7.2% decrease in the stock price last week, individual investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 25% stock also took a hit.
继上周股价下跌7.2%之后,个人投资者遭受的损失最大,但拥有25%股票的内部人士也受到打击。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group, beginning with the chart below.
让我们从下图开始,深入研究福建天马科技集团的每种所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group?
关于福建天马科技集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
We can see that Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到,福建天马科技集团确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看福建天马科技集团的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Qing Tang Chen with 19% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Fujian Tianma Science And Technology Group Co., Ltd., ESOP and Hainan Beiheng Private Equity Fund Management Center (Limited Partnership), with an equal amount of shares to their name at 4.5%.
对冲基金在福建天马科技集团的股份不多。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是首席执行官陈庆堂,其已发行股份的19%。第二和第三大股东是福建天马科技集团有限公司、ESOP和海南北恒私募股权基金管理中心(有限合伙),持有同等数量的股份,占4.5%。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
深入研究我们的所有权数据表明,前25名股东总共持有不到登记册的一半,这表明一大批小股东没有单一股东占多数。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。我们目前没有收到分析师对该股的任何报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group
福建天马科技集团的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.9b, and insiders have CN¥1.5b worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
内部人士似乎拥有福建天马科技集团股份有限公司的很大一部分股份。该公司的市值仅为59元人民币,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值15元人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有大量股份。你可以点击这里查看他们是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 58% of Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有福建天马科技集团58%的股份。这种所有权规模赋予了公众投资者一定的集体权力。他们可以而且可能确实会影响有关高管薪酬、股息政策和拟议业务收购的决策。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group you should be aware of, and 3 of them shouldn't be ignored.
拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,要更好地了解福建天马科技集团,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。一个很好的例子:我们已经发现了福建天马科技集团的4个警告标志,你应该注意其中 3 个不容忽视。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然,通过寻找其他地方,你可能会找到一笔不错的投资。因此,来看看这份有趣的公司的免费清单吧。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。