With 87% Ownership, Trinity Industries, Inc. (NYSE:TRN) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 87% Ownership, Trinity Industries, Inc. (NYSE:TRN) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Trinity Industries' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 6 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 鉴于机构在该股票的巨大持股,trinity industries的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 前6大股东拥有该公司50%的股份。
- 通过公司过去的业绩数据和股权研究,人们可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。
A look at the shareholders of Trinity Industries, Inc. (NYSE:TRN) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看trinity industries, inc. (纽交所:TRN) 的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。我们可以看到机构在公司中拥有87%的股份。换句话说,这个群体在他们对公司的投资中最有可能获得最大收益(或遭受最大损失)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
因为机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往带有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者来说。因此,机构投资在一家公司中的大量资金通常被视为一个积极因素。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Trinity Industries.
在下图中,我们聚焦于trinity industries的不同持有群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Trinity Industries?
机构持有情况告诉我们什么关于trinity industries?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Trinity Industries. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Trinity Industries' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如您所见,机构投资者在trinity industries中持有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉。然而,最好对依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证保持警惕。他们有时也会犯错。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,查看trinity industries的盈利历史是值得的。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Trinity Industries. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 16% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 6.8% of the stock.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。我们注意到对trinity industries的对冲基金没有显著投资。贝莱德公司目前是最大的股东,持有16%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约12%和6.8%的股票。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也是有意义的,以知道风向如何。就我们所知,目前并没有该公司的分析师覆盖。因此,可能被忽略了。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以加深对股票预期表现的全面了解也是一个好习惯。虽然有部分分析师的覆盖,但该公司可能没有受到广泛的关注。因此,在未来可能会受到更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of Trinity Industries
trinity industries的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Trinity Industries, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$46m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以报告,内部人士确实持有trinity industries, Inc.的股份。内部人士拥有价值4600万美元的重大股份。大多数人会将其视为一个真正的积极信号。如果您想探讨内部人对齐的问题,您可以点击这里查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Trinity Industries. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众,通常是个别投资者,持有trinity industries的12%股份。虽然这个群体不一定能掌控决定,但确实可以对公司如何运行产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Trinity Industries has 3 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.
我发现了解谁真正拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,风险 - Trinity Industries 有 3 个警告信号(还有 1 个不能忽视的)我们认为你应该了解。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。