share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Ferrari N.V.'s (NYSE:RACE) Recent US$3.2b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Ferrari N.V.'s (NYSE:RACE) Recent US$3.2b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

机构投资者可能会忽略法拉利N.V.(纽交所:RACE)最近320000000美元市值下降,因为长期利润保持增长
Simply Wall St ·  11/19 05:48

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Ferrari's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insider ownership in Ferrari is 11%
  • 显著的高机构持股意味着法拉利的股价对他们的交易行为敏感。
  • 前十大股东拥有该公司的50%。
  • 法拉利的内部持股为11%。

Every investor in Ferrari N.V. (NYSE:RACE) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 38% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每个法拉利N.V.(纽交所:RACE)的投资者应该意识到最强大的股东群体。持有最大部分股份的群体是机构,拥有38%的股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体的收益将最大(或者在股市下跌时损失也将最大)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$3.2b last week. However, the 20% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

机构投资者在公司市值上周下降32亿美元后承受了最高损失。然而,20%的年回报可能减轻了他们的痛苦。但他们可能会对未来的损失感到谨慎。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ferrari, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探讨法拉利的每一类拥有者,从下面的图表开始。

big
NYSE:RACE Ownership Breakdown November 19th 2024
纽交所:RACE 拥有权分布 2024年11月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ferrari?

有关法拉利的机构所有权告诉我们什么

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ferrari. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ferrari's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在法拉利中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好不要过于依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会出错。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得看看法拉利的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:RACE Earnings and Revenue Growth November 19th 2024
纽交所:RACE的营业收入和增长 2024年11月19日

Ferrari is not owned by hedge funds. Giovanni Agnelli B.V. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 25% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 3.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

法拉利并不被对冲基金拥有。 乔瓦尼·阿涅利目前是公司最大的股东,持有25%的流通股票。 同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有11%和3.3%的流通股票。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了更深入的挖掘,并发现前10大股东约占注册表的50%,这意味着除了大股东以外,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Ferrari

法拉利股权内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Ferrari N.V.. Insiders own US$8.2b worth of shares in the US$77b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人士拥有法拉利公司合理的股份比例。内部人士持有价值82亿美元的股票,而公司市值为770亿美元。这相当重要。看到这种投资水平令人欣慰。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否进行了买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 25% stake in Ferrari. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众,通常是个人投资者,持有法拉利25%的股份。虽然这一股份比例相当可观,但如果决策与其他大型股东不同,这一份额可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 25%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到私营公司拥有已发行股份的25%。值得深入研究。如果涉及方,例如内部人员,对其中的一个私营公司感兴趣,那么应在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能对公司有战略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Ferrari that you should be aware of before investing here.

虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常有价值的,但还有其他更重要的因素。 例如,我们发现法拉利有一个投资前应该注意的警告信号。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发