share_log

MFA Financial, Inc.'s (NYSE:MFA) Institutional Investors Lost 4.2% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

MFA Financial, Inc.'s (NYSE:MFA) Institutional Investors Lost 4.2% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

mfa financial, Inc.(纽交所:MFA)的机构投资者上周损失了4.2%,但从长期收益中受益。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/19 06:14

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, MFA Financial's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 由于机构在股票中的大笔持股,mfa financial的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
  • 前15大股东拥有该公司50%的股份。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of MFA Financial, Inc. (NYSE:MFA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 67% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了mfa financial, inc. (纽交所:MFA),理解业务的所有权结构是很重要的。我们可以看到,机构在公司中持有67%的股份。也就是说,这个团体在股票上涨时将获益最多(或者在出现下滑时损失最多)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.1b last week. However, the 19% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

机构投资者是公司市值上周下降至11亿美元后受到影响最大的群体。然而,19%的年回报可能帮助缓解了他们的整体损失。我们假设,他们将会关注未来的疲软表现。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about MFA Financial.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于mfa financial的事情。

big
NYSE:MFA Ownership Breakdown November 19th 2024
纽交所:mfa 所有权分解 2024年11月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MFA Financial?

机构持有情况能告诉我们关于mfa financial什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

MFA Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see MFA Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

mfa financial已经在股东注册中存在机构。事实上,他们在公司中持有相当可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅依赖这一点,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像任何人一样。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总有风险,他们可能处于一种'拥挤的交易'中。当这样的交易出错时,多个参与者可能会争相快速卖出股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到mfa financial的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事通常比这更复杂。

big
NYSE:MFA Earnings and Revenue Growth November 19th 2024
纽交所:MFA营业收入和营业收入增长 2024年11月19日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in MFA Financial. Wellington Management Group LLP is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. With 9.9% and 9.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Craig Knutson directly holds 0.6% of the total shares outstanding.

机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们可以强有力地影响董事会的决策。我们注意到对mfa financial的对冲基金投资并不显著。威灵顿管理集团有限责任公司目前是公司的最大股东,持有11%的流通股。先锋集团和贝莱德分别持有9.9%和9.4%的流通股,排名第二和第三大的股东。此外,公司的首席执行官Craig Knutson直接持有0.6%的流通股。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

从股东名册上可以看出,50%的所有权由前15名股东控制,这意味着没有单一股东拥有大多数的所有权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of MFA Financial

mfa financial的内部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

We can see that insiders own shares in MFA Financial, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$16m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以看到内部人士在mfa financial, inc.中拥有股份。这是一家大公司,因此看到这种水平的对齐是件好事。内部人士拥有1600万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。如果您想探讨内部人士对齐的问题,可以点击这里查看内部人士是否有买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 31% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over MFA Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众持有31%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,因此在mfa financial中有一定的影响力。虽然这一群体不一定能够做出决定,但确实可以对公司的运营产生真实影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - MFA Financial has 3 warning signs (and 2 which make us uncomfortable) we think you should know about.

我发现研究到底谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例 - mfa financial 有 3 个警告信号(还有 2 个让我们感到不安的信号),我们认为你应该了解这些信息。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发