Is ICL Group (NYSE:ICL) A Risky Investment?
Is ICL Group (NYSE:ICL) A Risky Investment?
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, ICL Group Ltd (NYSE:ICL) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
传奇基金经理李露(由查理·芒格支持)曾经说过:“最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受永久的资本损失。”因此,当你评估公司的风险时,看来聪明的货币知道债务(通常涉及破产)是一个非常重要的因素。重要的是,ICL集团有限公司(纽约证券交易所代码:ICL)确实有债务。但是,股东是否应该担心其债务的使用?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
债务何时危险?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
当企业无法通过自由现金流或以诱人的价格筹集资金来轻松履行这些义务时,债务和其他负债就会成为风险。最终,如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能会一无所获。但是,更频繁(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,公司必须以低廉的价格发行股票,永久稀释股东,以支撑其资产负债表。当然,债务的好处在于它通常代表廉价资本,尤其是当它以高回报率进行再投资的能力取代公司的稀释时。当我们考虑公司使用债务时,我们首先将现金和债务放在一起考虑。
How Much Debt Does ICL Group Carry?
ICL集团背负了多少债务?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that ICL Group had US$2.45b of debt in September 2024, down from US$2.58b, one year before. On the flip side, it has US$503.0m in cash leading to net debt of about US$1.95b.
你可以点击下图查看历史数字,但它显示ICL集团在2024年9月的债务为24.5亿美元,低于一年前的25.8亿美元。另一方面,它拥有5.030亿美元的现金,净负债约为19.5亿美元。
How Healthy Is ICL Group's Balance Sheet?
ICL集团的资产负债表有多健康?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that ICL Group had liabilities of US$2.45b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$2.97b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$503.0m and US$1.39b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$3.53b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
我们可以从最新的资产负债表中看出,ICL集团的负债为24.5亿美元,一年后到期的负债为29.7亿美元。另一方面,它有5.030亿美元的现金和价值13.9亿美元的应收账款将在一年内到期。因此,它的负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的总和多出35.3亿美元。
This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$5.70b. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.
相对于其570亿美元的市值,这是一座巨大的杠杆率。如果其贷款人要求其支撑资产负债表,股东可能会面临严重的稀释。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我们使用两个主要比率来告知我们相对于收益的债务水平。第一个是净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),第二个是其利息和税前收益(EBIT)覆盖其利息支出(或简称利息保障)的多少倍。这样,我们既考虑债务的绝对数量,也考虑为债务支付的利率。
ICL Group's net debt of 1.6 times EBITDA suggests graceful use of debt. And the fact that its trailing twelve months of EBIT was 9.0 times its interest expenses harmonizes with that theme. It is just as well that ICL Group's load is not too heavy, because its EBIT was down 50% over the last year. Falling earnings (if the trend continues) could eventually make even modest debt quite risky. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine ICL Group's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
ICL集团的净负债为息税折旧摊销前利润的1.6倍,这表明债务的合理使用。而且,其过去十二个月的息税前利润是其利息支出的9.0倍,这一事实与这一主题一致。同样地,ICL集团的负荷并不太重,因为其息税前利润比去年下降了50%。收益下降(如果这种趋势持续下去)最终也可能使即使是微不足道的债务也相当危险。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但是,未来的收益将决定ICL集团未来维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果您专注于未来,可以查看这份显示分析师利润预测的免费报告。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. In the last three years, ICL Group's free cash flow amounted to 50% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最后,公司只能用冷硬现金偿还债务,不能用会计利润偿还债务。因此,我们显然需要研究该息税前利润是否会带来相应的自由现金流。在过去三年中,ICL集团的自由现金流占其息税前利润的50%,低于我们的预期。这种疲软的现金转换使得处理债务变得更加困难。
Our View
我们的观点
ICL Group's struggle to grow its EBIT had us second guessing its balance sheet strength, but the other data-points we considered were relatively redeeming. For example, its interest cover is relatively strong. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think ICL Group's debt poses some risks to the business. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for ICL Group that you should be aware of before investing here.
ICL集团努力增加其息税前利润让我们再次猜测其资产负债表的实力,但我们考虑的其他数据点相对可以兑现。例如,它的利息保障相对较强。综合上述因素,我们确实认为ICL集团的债务对业务构成了一些风险。尽管这笔债务可以提高回报,但我们认为该公司现在有足够的杠杆作用。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中学到的关于债务的知识最多。但归根结底,每家公司都可以控制资产负债表之外存在的风险。例如,我们发现了ICL集团的两个警告信号,在投资之前,您应该注意这些信号。
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
毕竟,如果你对一家资产负债表坚如磐石的快速成长型公司更感兴趣,那么请立即查看我们的净现金增长股票清单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。