Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s (NYSE:NCLH) Institutional Investors Lost 3.5% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s (NYSE:NCLH) Institutional Investors Lost 3.5% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 机构在挪威邮轮控股公司的 substantial holdings 意味着他们对公司股价拥有重要影响力。
- 该公司共有14个投资者拥有其51%的多数股权。
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
A look at the shareholders of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NYSE:NCLH) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 75% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看挪威邮轮控股有限公司(纽交所:NCLH)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。我们看到机构在公司中拥有75%的股份。换句话说,这个群体从对公司的投资中获得最多的收益(或承受最多的损失)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$12b last week. Still, the 83% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
机构投资者是最受影响的群体,因为该公司的市值上周降至120亿美金。不过,83%的年度收益可能帮助减轻了他们的整体损失。然而,我们假设他们将会关注未来的弱点。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings.
在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于挪威邮轮控股公司的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings?
机构所有权告诉我们关于挪威邮轮控股公司什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在挪威邮轮控股公司中拥有相当的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一些可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总是存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出错时,多个参与者可能会争相快速出售股票。对于一家没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。您可以看到挪威邮轮控股公司的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是还有更多。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 6.5% of the stock.
机构投资者持有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能会强有力地影响董事会的决策。 挪威邮轮公司并不被对冲基金所拥有。 公司的最大股东是先锋集团,拥有12%的股份。 相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约12%和6.5%的股票。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 14 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记簿中可以看出,51%的股权由前14名股东控制,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings
挪威邮轮公司的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$71m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们最近的数据表明,内幕人士持有挪威邮轮公司少于1%的股份。由于它是一家大型公司,我们只期望内幕人士持有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他们持有价值7100万美元的股票。看到至少有一些内幕持股总是不错,但可能值得检查一下这些内幕人士是否在卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众持有25%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,对挪威邮轮公司有一定的影响力。虽然这种规模的持股可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (1 can't be ignored) that you should be aware of.
我发现研究一个公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但是要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已识别出挪威邮轮控股公司存在3个警告信号(1个不能忽视),您应该注意这些。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。