Scholastic (NASDAQ:SCHL) Has Some Way To Go To Become A Multi-Bagger
Scholastic (NASDAQ:SCHL) Has Some Way To Go To Become A Multi-Bagger
If we want to find a potential multi-bagger, often there are underlying trends that can provide clues. In a perfect world, we'd like to see a company investing more capital into its business and ideally the returns earned from that capital are also increasing. Ultimately, this demonstrates that it's a business that is reinvesting profits at increasing rates of return. Having said that, from a first glance at Scholastic (NASDAQ:SCHL) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look.
如果我们想找到潜在的多袋装货商,通常有潜在的趋势可以提供线索。在一个完美的世界中,我们希望看到一家公司向其业务投入更多资本,理想情况下,从这些资本中获得的回报也在增加。归根结底,这表明这是一家以更高的回报率对利润进行再投资的企业。话虽如此,乍一看Scholastic(纳斯达克股票代码:SCHL),我们并不是对回报率的趋势不屑一顾,但让我们更深入地了解一下。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
了解资本使用回报率 (ROCE)
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for Scholastic, this is the formula:
对于那些不确定ROCE是什么的人,它衡量的是公司从其业务中使用的资本中可以产生的税前利润金额。要计算 Scholastic 的这个指标,公式如下:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已动用资本回报率 = 息税前收益(EBIT)÷(总资产-流动负债)
0.032 = US$43m ÷ (US$2.0b - US$628m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to August 2024).
0.032 = 4,300万美元 ÷(20亿美元至6.28亿美元)(基于截至2024年8月的过去十二个月)。
Thus, Scholastic has an ROCE of 3.2%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Media industry average of 9.4%.
因此,Scholastic的投资回报率为3.2%。从绝对值来看,这是一个低回报,其表现也低于媒体行业9.4%的平均水平。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for Scholastic compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Scholastic for free.
上面你可以看到Scholastic当前的投资回报率与其先前的资本回报率相比如何,但从过去可以看出来的只有那么多。如果你愿意,你可以免费查看报道Scholastic的分析师的预测。
The Trend Of ROCE
ROCE 的趋势
Things have been pretty stable at Scholastic, with its capital employed and returns on that capital staying somewhat the same for the last five years. Businesses with these traits tend to be mature and steady operations because they're past the growth phase. So unless we see a substantial change at Scholastic in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger.
Scholastic的情况一直相当稳定,在过去五年中,其资本使用率和资本回报率基本保持不变。具有这些特征的企业往往是成熟而稳定的运营,因为它们已经过了增长阶段。因此,除非我们看到Scholastic在投资回报率方面发生重大变化并进行额外投资,否则我们不会屏住呼吸成为一家多口袋公司。
The Bottom Line
底线
We can conclude that in regards to Scholastic's returns on capital employed and the trends, there isn't much change to report on. Since the stock has declined 27% over the last five years, investors may not be too optimistic on this trend improving either. All in all, the inherent trends aren't typical of multi-baggers, so if that's what you're after, we think you might have more luck elsewhere.
我们可以得出结论,就Scholastic的已动用资本回报率和趋势而言,没有太大变化可报告。由于该股在过去五年中下跌了27%,因此投资者对这一趋势的改善可能也不太乐观。总而言之,多装袋机的固有趋势并不常见,因此,如果您想要这样做,我们认为您在其他地方可能会有更多的运气。
If you want to continue researching Scholastic, you might be interested to know about the 3 warning signs that our analysis has discovered.
如果你想继续研究Scholastic,你可能有兴趣了解我们的分析发现的3个警告信号。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果你想寻找收益丰厚的稳健公司,可以免费查看这份资产负债表良好且股本回报率可观的公司名单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。