LifeMD, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LFMD) Market Cap Dropped US$62m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 43% Were Hit as Were Institutions
LifeMD, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LFMD) Market Cap Dropped US$62m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 43% Were Hit as Were Institutions
Key Insights
主要见解
- LifeMD's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 46% ownership
- Recent purchases by insiders
- LifeMD的散户投资者持股比例显著,表明关键决策受到更大公共股东的影响。
- 公司分为25个投资者,共拥有46%的股份。
- 最近有内部人员购买。
Every investor in LifeMD, Inc. (NASDAQ:LFMD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每个在LifeMD公司的投资者(纳斯达克:LFMD)都应该了解最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,散户投资者在公司中拥有43%的控股权。这意味着,如果股票上涨,该群体将受益最大(如果下跌则损失最多)。
Following a 20% decrease in the stock price last week, retail investors suffered the most losses, but institutions who own 40% stock also took a hit.
在上周股票价格下降20%之后,散户投资者遭受了最大的损失,但拥有40%股票的机构也受到了影响。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about LifeMD.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能为我们提供关于LifeMD的什么信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About LifeMD?
机构所有权对LifeMD有何含义?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that LifeMD does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at LifeMD's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到LifeMD确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的很大一部分。这可以表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证最好还是要小心。他们有时也会犯错。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此值得查看下面LifeMD的营业收入历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in LifeMD. With a 6.1% stake, CEO Justin Schreiber is the largest shareholder. With 5.7% and 3.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
我们注意到对LifeMD的对冲基金投资不多。首席执行官贾斯廷·施雷伯(Justin Schreiber)持有6.1%的股份,是最大的股东。黑石集团(BlackRock, Inc.)和先锋集团(The Vanguard Group, Inc.)分别持有5.7%和3.9%股份,是第二和第三大股东。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of LifeMD
LifeMD的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of LifeMD, Inc.. Insiders have a US$31m stake in this US$241m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看来内部人士持有LifeMD, Inc.相当大比例的股份。内部人士在这家价值24100万美元的企业中持有3100万美元的股份。我们认为这表明与股东的一致性,但值得注意的是,这家公司仍然相当小;一些内部人士可能是这家公司的创始人。您可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否进行了买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 43% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
广大公众--包括散户投资者--持有该公司的43%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然此群体不一定能左右大局,但它肯定会对公司如何运营产生真正的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 3.9%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们的数据显示,私人公司持有公司股份的3.9%。私人公司可能是相关方。有时内部人士通过持有私人公司的股份而不是以个人的身份对公共公司产生兴趣。虽然很难得出任何广义结论,但这值得作为进一步研究的一个方向。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand LifeMD better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with LifeMD (at least 1 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
始终值得考虑拥有公司股票的不同群体。但要更好地理解LifeMD,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。比如,投资风险始终伴随在侧。我们已经发现了LifeMD的3个警告信号(至少1个不应被忽视),理解这些信号应该是您投资过程的一部分。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。