share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Ball Corporation's (NYSE:BALL) Recent US$767m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Ball Corporation's (NYSE:BALL) Recent US$767m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

机构所有者可能会忽略Ball公司(纽交所:BALL)最近76700万美元市值下降,因为长期利润保持向好。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/21 01:00

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Ball's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 显著的高机构持股意味着Ball的股票价格对其交易行为很敏感。
  • 前12个股东持有业务的51%。
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。

A look at the shareholders of Ball Corporation (NYSE:BALL) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

查看Ball Corporation(纽交所代码:BALL)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。我们可以看到机构在公司中拥有绝大多数股份,达到86%的持有比例。也就是说,这个群体在股票上涨时最多受益(或在下跌时损失最多)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$18b last week. Still, the 13% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

机构投资者在上周公司市值下降至180亿美元后受到的影响最大。然而,13%的年收益可能有助于减少他们的整体损失。不过,他们应该注意未来可能出现的进一步损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Ball.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们什么关于Ball的信息。

big
NYSE:BALL Ownership Breakdown November 20th 2024
纽交所: BALL 所有权分布 2024年11月20日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ball?

机构持股对Ball的意义是什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ball. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ball, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所见,机构投资者在Ball中拥有相当比例的股份。这意味着为那些机构工作的分析师已经研究了这只股票并且喜欢它。但和其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时卖出一只股票,股票价格大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,查看Ball的过去收益轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:BALL Earnings and Revenue Growth November 20th 2024
纽交所:BALL 财报和营业收入增长 2024年11月20日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Ball is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 7.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投资者应注意,机构实际上持有公司一半以上的股份,因此他们可以共同发挥重要作用。Ball并不由对冲基金持有。公司的最大股东是先锋集团(The Vanguard Group, Inc.),持有12%的股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有7.9%和7.4%的流通股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

考虑到前12名股东拥有51%的股份,这意味着没有单一的股东拥有多数。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Ball

Ball的内部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Ball Corporation in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$112m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的数据表明,内部人士以自己名义拥有Ball Corporation不到1%的股份。 这是一家非常大型的公司,因此看到内部人士拥有公司大比例的股份会令人感到惊讶。尽管他们的持有量不到1%,我们可以看到董事会成员集体拥有价值11200万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到董事会成员持有股票是件好事,但可能值得检查一下那些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投资者在内的公众持有公司的13%股权,因此不能被轻易忽略。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以在他们有利时推动政策决策,但他们仍可以共同影响公司的政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Ball you should be aware of, and 2 of them are concerning.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体是非常重要的,但还有其他因素更加关键。举个例子:我们发现了3个关于Ball的警告迹象,你应该注意,其中有2个是令人担忧的。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发