With 70% Institutional Ownership, Lennox International Inc. (NYSE:LII) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 70% Institutional Ownership, Lennox International Inc. (NYSE:LII) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lennox International's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 机构持股比例高意味着雷诺士的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感
- 前13大股东持有公司50%的股份。
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
A look at the shareholders of Lennox International Inc. (NYSE:LII) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 70% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
分析雷诺士国际公司(纽交所:LII)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,占有70%。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由于机构业主拥有巨额资源和流动性资产,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的影响力,尤其是对个人投资者。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于一家公司通常被视为一种理想的特征。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lennox International, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解雷诺士的每一类型股东,首先从下面的图表开始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lennox International?
机构持股告诉我们关于雷诺士的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Lennox International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lennox International, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
雷诺士已经有机构出现在股东名册上。确实,他们在公司中拥有一定比例的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖于这一事实,因为有时机构会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人都会一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查雷诺士的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Lennox International is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.1% of common stock, and Norris Family Limited Partnership holds about 7.1% of the company stock.
投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以集体行使重要影响力。雷诺士并不是由对冲基金拥有。黑石集团目前是该公司最大的股东,持有10%的股份。领先集团是第二大股东,拥有9.1%的普通股,Norris Family Limited Partnership持有约7.1%的公司股票。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
在我们的所有权数字中仔细看看,前13名股东拥有的股权合计为50%,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Lennox International
雷诺士国际的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Lennox International Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$701m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.
我们最新的数据显示,雷诺士国际有限公司的内部持有一些股票。这是一家非常大的公司,董事会成员共拥有价值70100万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。我们有时会对他们是在买入还是卖出感兴趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众(包括散户投资者)拥有公司的20%股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然这个群体不能必然占据主导地位,但它肯定可以对公司的运营产生实际的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 7.1%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们可以看到私人公司拥有已发行股份的7.1%。值得进一步深入了解。如果相关方,如内部人员,在其中一家私人公司拥有利益,则应在年度报告中披露。私人公司也可能对该公司有战略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Lennox International has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同团体非常重要,但有其他更重要的因素。以风险为例-雷诺士有2个警告信号,我们认为您应该注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。