Is PG&E Corporation's (NYSE:PCG) ROE Of 10% Impressive?
Is PG&E Corporation's (NYSE:PCG) ROE Of 10% Impressive?
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). We'll use ROE to examine PG&E Corporation (NYSE:PCG), by way of a worked example.
许多投资者仍在学习分析股票时可能有用的各种指标。本文适用于那些想了解股本回报率(ROE)的人。举一个行之有效的例子,我们将使用投资回报率来考察PG&E公司(纽约证券交易所代码:PCG)。
Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. Put another way, it reveals the company's success at turning shareholder investments into profits.
股本回报率或投资回报率是对公司增值和管理投资者资金的有效性的考验。换句话说,它揭示了公司成功地将股东投资转化为利润。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
你如何计算股本回报率?
The formula for return on equity is:
股本回报率的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股本回报率 = 净利润(来自持续经营)÷ 股东权益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for PG&E is:
因此,根据上述公式,PG&E的投资回报率为:
10% = US$2.7b ÷ US$27b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
10% = 27亿美元 ÷ 270亿美元(基于截至2024年9月的过去十二个月)。
The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. That means that for every $1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated $0.10 in profit.
“回报” 是过去十二个月的税后收入。这意味着,每获得价值1美元的股东权益,该公司就会产生0.10美元的利润。
Does PG&E Have A Good Return On Equity?
PG&E 有良好的股本回报率吗?
One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see PG&E has a similar ROE to the average in the Electric Utilities industry classification (9.3%).
确定公司股本回报率是否不错的一种简单方法是将其与该行业的平均水平进行比较。这种方法的局限性在于,有些公司与其他公司有很大不同,即使在相同的行业分类中也是如此。如果你看下图,你会发现PG&E的投资回报率与电力公用事业行业分类中的平均水平(9.3%)相似。
So while the ROE is not exceptional, at least its acceptable. Even if the ROE is respectable when compared to the industry, its worth checking if the firm's ROE is being aided by high debt levels. If true, then it is more an indication of risk than the potential. You can see the 2 risks we have identified for PG&E by visiting our risks dashboard for free on our platform here.
因此,尽管投资回报率并不例外,但至少是可以接受的。即使与行业相比,投资回报率可观,也值得检查一下公司的投资回报率是否受到高额债务水平的支撑。如果属实,则与其说是潜在风险,不如说是风险。您可以在此处的平台上免费访问我们的风险仪表板,查看我们为PG&E确定的两种风险。
Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE
为什么在考虑投资回报率时应该考虑债务
Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.
几乎所有公司都需要资金来投资业务,增加利润。这些现金可以来自发行股票、留存收益或债务。在前两个案例中,投资回报率将涵盖这种资本用于增长的用途。在后一种情况下,增长所需的债务将提高回报,但不会影响股东权益。因此,使用债务可以提高投资回报率,尽管可以隐喻地说,暴风雨天气会带来额外的风险。
Combining PG&E's Debt And Its 10% Return On Equity
合并PG&E的债务及其10%的股本回报率
It's worth noting the high use of debt by PG&E, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 2.17. The combination of a rather low ROE and significant use of debt is not particularly appealing. Debt increases risk and reduces options for the company in the future, so you generally want to see some good returns from using it.
值得注意的是,PG&E大量使用债务,导致其债务权益比率为2.17。相当低的投资回报率和大量使用债务相结合并不是特别有吸引力。债务会增加风险,减少公司未来的选择,因此您通常希望从使用债务中获得丰厚的回报。
Summary
摘要
Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
股本回报率是我们可以比较不同公司的业务质量的一种方式。在我们的账簿中,尽管债务很低,但质量最高的公司的股本回报率却很高。如果两家公司的债务与股权比率大致相同,而一家公司的投资回报率更高,那么我通常更喜欢投资回报率更高的那家公司。
But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.
但是投资回报率只是更大难题中的一部分,因为高质量的企业通常以高倍的收益进行交易。重要的是要考虑其他因素,例如未来的利润增长,以及未来需要多少投资。因此,你可能想看看这张数据丰富的公司预测交互式图表。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果你更愿意去另一家公司——一家财务状况可能优越的公司——那么千万不要错过这份免费的股本回报率高、债务低的有趣公司的名单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。