While Individual Investors Own 33% of CapitaLand Investment Limited (SGX:9CI), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 54% Ownership
While Individual Investors Own 33% of CapitaLand Investment Limited (SGX:9CI), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 54% Ownership
Key Insights
关键见解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in CapitaLand Investment indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 54% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Bartley Investments Pte. Ltd.)
- 13% of CapitaLand Investment is held by Institutions
- 私营公司在CapitaLand Investment中拥有大量所有权,这表明它们在管理和业务战略中集体拥有更大的发言权
- 该公司54%的股份由单一股东持有(Bartley Investments Pte.有限公司)
- 13% 的凯德置地投资由机构持有
A look at the shareholders of CapitaLand Investment Limited (SGX:9CI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看凯德置地投资有限公司(SGX: 9CI)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,私营公司拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为54%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。
Meanwhile, individual investors make up 33% of the company's shareholders.
同时,个人投资者占公司股东的33%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CapitaLand Investment.
在下图中,我们放大了凯德置地投资的不同所有权群体。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241121/0-539b3c11b3b4ed95af4e0261bad7a866-0-e674e6f0ac8df9d62b2acf0c78ea5ba6.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CapitaLand Investment?
关于凯德置地投资,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CapitaLand Investment. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CapitaLand Investment's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所见,机构投资者在凯德置地投资中拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到CapitaLand Investment的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多内容。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241121/0-539b3c11b3b4ed95af4e0261bad7a866-1-d85f7b9247e6627b0e48f854364531ff.png/big)
CapitaLand Investment is not owned by hedge funds. Bartley Investments Pte. Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 54% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.2% and 2.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
凯德置地投资不归对冲基金所有。巴特利投资私人有限公司Ltd. 目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的54%。由于所有权持有如此巨额的股份,我们推断他们对公司的未来拥有重大控制权。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的2.2%和2.1%。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of CapitaLand Investment
凯德置地投资的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of CapitaLand Investment Limited in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own S$28m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的数据表明,内部人士以自己的名义拥有凯德置地投资有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,我们确实注意到,内部人士有可能通过私营公司或其他公司结构获得间接利益。由于规模如此之大,我们预计内部人士不会拥有很大一部分股票。他们共拥有2800万新元的股票。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样值得考虑。您可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 33% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over CapitaLand Investment. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有33%所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对凯德置地投资有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 54%, of the CapitaLand Investment stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
私人公司似乎拥有凯德置地投资公司54%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for CapitaLand Investment you should be aware of, and 2 of them shouldn't be ignored.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。一个很好的例子:我们发现了你应该注意的3个凯德置地投资警告信号,其中两个不容忽视。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。