share_log

RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 83% of the Company

RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 83% of the Company

RPm International Inc. (纽交所:RPM) 受到机构投资者的青睐,持有该公司83%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/21 18:24

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, RPM International's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 12 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 由于机构在股票中的大额持股,rpm international的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
  • 前12名股东拥有该公司50%的股份。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正掌控rpm international inc. (纽交所:RPM),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。持有公司最多股份的团体,具体来说是约83%,是机构。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该团体将受益最大(如果出现下跌,则损失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考虑到机构持有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构投资者投资公司的大量资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about RPM International.

让我们更仔细地看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于rpm international的信息。

big
NYSE:RPM Ownership Breakdown November 21st 2024
纽交所:RPm 2024年11月21日的所有权分布

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RPM International?

机构持股对我们了解rpm international的意义是什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

RPM International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see RPM International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

rpm international已经在股票登记册上有机构的存在。实际上,他们在公司中拥有一份可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总是存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个方可能会竞争快速卖出股票。对于没有增长历史的公司来说,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到rpm international的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,事情总是有更多的故事。

big
NYSE:RPM Earnings and Revenue Growth November 21st 2024
纽交所: rpm国际的收益和营业收入增长2024年11月21日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in RPM International. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and Aristotle Capital Management, LLC holds about 7.1% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Frank Sullivan is the owner of 0.8% of the company's shares.

机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们可以共同强有力地影响董事会的决策。对冲基金在rpm international的持股不多。先锋集团目前是公司的最大股东,持有11%的流通股份。贝莱德是第二大股东,拥有10%的普通股票,亚里士多德资本管理有限公司持有大约7.1%的公司股票。此外,首席执行官Frank Sullivan持有0.8%的公司股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过一些调查,我们发现前12名股东在公司中拥有50%的股份,表明没有单一股东对公司具有重大控制权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构持股比例是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。同样可以通过研究分析师情绪来实现。由于相当多的分析师都关注着该股票,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of RPM International

rpm国际的内部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

We can see that insiders own shares in RPM International Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$218m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我们可以看到内部人拥有rpm international inc.的股份。 这是一家非常大的公司,董事会成员共同拥有价值21800万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。 我们有时会关注他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in RPM International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众,通常是散户投资者,在rpm international中持有16%的股份。 虽然这一群体并不一定能够决定一切,但它确实能对公司的运行产生真实的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - RPM International has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我发现研究谁真正拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获取洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 比如风险 - rpm international有 2 个警示信号,我们认为你应该注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发