Does Bunge Global (NYSE:BG) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does Bunge Global (NYSE:BG) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Bunge Global SA (NYSE:BG) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
传奇基金经理李露(由查理·芒格支持)曾经说过:“最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受永久的资本损失。”当我们考虑一家公司的风险时,我们总是喜欢考虑其债务的用途,因为债务过载可能导致破产。与许多其他公司一样,邦吉环球股份有限公司(纽约证券交易所代码:BG)也使用债务。但更重要的问题是:债务创造了多大的风险?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
债务何时危险?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
债务是帮助企业增长的工具,但是如果企业无法偿还贷款,那么债务就任其摆布。资本主义的组成部分是 “创造性破坏” 过程,在这种过程中,倒闭的企业被银行家无情地清算。但是,更常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,公司为了控制债务,必须以低廉的股价稀释股东。当然,债务的好处在于它通常代表廉价资本,尤其是当它以高回报率进行再投资的能力取代公司的稀释时。当我们考虑公司使用债务时,我们首先将现金和债务放在一起考虑。
What Is Bunge Global's Debt?
邦吉环球的债务是什么?
As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, Bunge Global had US$6.20b of debt, up from US$5.18b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have US$3.01b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$3.18b.
如下所示,截至2024年9月底,邦吉环球的债务为62.0亿美元,高于去年同期的51.8亿美元。点击图片查看更多细节。但是,它确实有30.1亿美元的现金抵消了这一点,净负债约为31.8亿美元。
How Strong Is Bunge Global's Balance Sheet?
邦吉环球的资产负债表有多强?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Bunge Global had liabilities of US$7.69b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$6.42b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$3.01b as well as receivables valued at US$2.67b due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$8.43b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
根据上次报告的资产负债表,邦吉环球在12个月内到期的负债为76.9亿美元,12个月以后到期的负债为64.2亿美元。除了这些债务外,它还有30.1亿美元的现金以及价值26.7亿美元的应收账款将在12个月内到期。因此,它的负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的总和多出84.3亿美元。
This is a mountain of leverage even relative to its gargantuan market capitalization of US$12.5b. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.
即使与其125亿美元的庞大市值相比,这也是一座巨大的杠杆率。如果其贷款人要求其支撑资产负债表,股东可能会面临严重的稀释。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
为了扩大公司相对于收益的负债规模,我们计算其净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),将其利息和税前收益(EBIT)除以利息支出(利息保障)。因此,我们将债务与收益的关系考虑在内,包括和不包括折旧和摊销费用。
While Bunge Global's low debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.3 suggests only modest use of debt, the fact that EBIT only covered the interest expense by 5.6 times last year does give us pause. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. Shareholders should be aware that Bunge Global's EBIT was down 33% last year. If that decline continues then paying off debt will be harder than selling foie gras at a vegan convention. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Bunge Global's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
尽管邦吉环球的低债务与息税折旧摊销前利润比率为1.3,这表明债务的使用量不大,但去年息税前利润仅涵盖了5.6倍的利息支出,这一事实确实让我们停顿了一下。但是,利息支付肯定足以让我们考虑其债务的负担能力。股东们应该意识到,邦吉环球的息税前利润去年下降了33%。如果这种下降持续下去,那么偿还债务将比在素食大会上出售鹅肝更难。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但是,未来的收益将决定邦吉环球未来维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果您专注于未来,可以查看这份显示分析师利润预测的免费报告。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, Bunge Global burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最后,企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润根本无法减少债务。因此,值得检查一下该息税前利润中有多少是由自由现金流支持的。在过去的三年中,邦吉环球消耗了大量现金。尽管这可能是增长支出的结果,但它确实使债务风险大大增加。
Our View
我们的观点
To be frank both Bunge Global's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and its track record of (not) growing its EBIT make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But on the bright side, its net debt to EBITDA is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. We're quite clear that we consider Bunge Global to be really rather risky, as a result of its balance sheet health. For this reason we're pretty cautious about the stock, and we think shareholders should keep a close eye on its liquidity. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Bunge Global .
坦率地说,邦吉环球将息税前利润转换为自由现金流,以及其(不)增长息税前利润的往绩都使我们对其债务水平感到相当不舒服。但好的一面是,其净负债占息税折旧摊销前利润的比例是一个好兆头,也使我们更加乐观。我们很清楚,由于Bunge Global的资产负债表状况良好,我们认为Bunge Global的风险确实相当大。出于这个原因,我们对该股非常谨慎,我们认为股东应密切关注其流动性。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但是,并非所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表中,远非如此。为此,你应该注意我们在Bunge Global上发现的1个警告信号。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
当然,如果你是那种喜欢在没有债务负担的情况下购买股票的投资者,那么请立即查看我们的独家净现金增长股票清单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。