Chemours (NYSE:CC) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky
Chemours (NYSE:CC) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that The Chemours Company (NYSE:CC) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
传奇基金经理李露(查理·芒格支持的人)曾说过:‘最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受永久性资本损失。’ 在你审视一家公司风险有多大时,自然会考虑公司的资产负债表,因为企业崩溃时往往涉及到债务。我们注意到化工公司(纽交所:CC)确实在其资产负债表上有债务。但这债务对股东们来说是个问题吗?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
为什么债务会带来风险?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
债务可以帮助一家公司,直到公司难以偿还,无论是通过新的资本还是通过自由现金流。如果情况变得非常糟糕,债权人可以接管企业。虽然这种情况并不常见,但我们经常看到负债累累的公司因债权人迫使他们以低于市值的价格筹集资本而导致股东权益被稀释。当然,很多公司使用债务来资助增长,没有任何负面后果。在考虑一家企业使用多少债务时,第一件事是查看它的现金和债务。
How Much Debt Does Chemours Carry?
化工公司的债务有多少?
As you can see below, Chemours had US$3.99b of debt, at September 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had US$596.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$3.40b.
正如您在下面看到的,化工公司在2024年9月的债务为39.9亿美元,与前一年基本持平。您可以点击图表获取更多细节。然而,它还有59600万美元的现金,因此其净债务为34亿美元。
How Strong Is Chemours' Balance Sheet?
Chemours的资产负债表有多强?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Chemours had liabilities of US$1.78b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$5.03b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$596.0m as well as receivables valued at US$951.0m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$5.26b.
从最近的资产负债表来看,Chemours在一年内到期的负债为17.8亿美元,以及超过这一时间到期的负债为50.3亿美元。为了抵消这些负债,它拥有59600万美元的现金以及在12个月内到期的应收账款,价值95100万美元。因此,它的负债超出其现金和(短期)应收款的总和52.6亿美元。
The deficiency here weighs heavily on the US$2.88b company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. At the end of the day, Chemours would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.
这里的不足严重影响了这家28.8亿美元的公司,就像一个孩子背着满是书籍、体育器材和小号的沉重背包一样。因此,我们确实认为股东需要密切关注这一点。最终,如果债权人要求偿还,Chemours可能需要进行大规模的再融资。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我们通过查看净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比以及计算其利息支出由收益前利息和税(EBIT)覆盖的程度来度量一家公司的债务负载相对于其收益能力的程度。此方法的优点在于我们同时考虑了债务的绝对量(以净债务为EBITDA)以及与该债务相关的实际利息支出(以其利息覆盖倍数计算)。
While Chemours's debt to EBITDA ratio (4.3) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 1.9, suggesting high leverage. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. Investors should also be troubled by the fact that Chemours saw its EBIT drop by 15% over the last twelve months. If that's the way things keep going handling the debt load will be like delivering hot coffees on a pogo stick. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Chemours's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
尽管Chemours的债务与EBITDA的比率为4.3,表明它使用了一些债务,但其利息覆盖率非常低,仅为1.9,这表明杠杆率很高。因此,股东应该意识到,利息支出似乎最近真的影响了业务。投资者还应该对Chemours在过去12个月内EBIT下降15%的事实感到担忧。如果这种情况持续下去,那么承受债务负担就像在蹦床上送热咖啡一样毫无疑问。我们从资产负债表中学到的关于债务的知识是最多的。但未来的收益,尤其是将决定Chemours在未来维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果你专注于未来,可以查看这份免费的报告,展示分析师的利润预测。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, Chemours recorded negative free cash flow, in total. Debt is usually more expensive, and almost always more risky in the hands of a company with negative free cash flow. Shareholders ought to hope for an improvement.
最后,虽然税务部门可能喜爱会计利润,但贷款人只接受冷硬的现金。 所以我们显然需要看看EBIT是否带来了相应的自由现金流。 在过去三年中,the chemours记录了负的自由现金流,总额为负值。 债务通常更昂贵,并且在拥有负自由现金流的公司手中几乎总是更具风险。 股东们应该希望有所改善。
Our View
我们的观点
On the face of it, Chemours's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow left us tentative about the stock, and its level of total liabilities was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. And even its EBIT growth rate fails to inspire much confidence. Considering all the factors previously mentioned, we think that Chemours really is carrying too much debt. To our minds, that means the stock is rather high risk, and probably one to avoid; but to each their own (investing) style. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Chemours is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those are significant...
从表面上看,the chemours将EBIT转化为自由现金流使我们对股票持观望态度,其总负债水平并不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚那家空餐馆更具吸引力。 甚至其EBIT增长率也未能激发太多信心。 考虑到之前提到的所有因素,我们认为the chemours实际上背负了过多的债务。 在我们看来,这意味着该股票风险相对较高,可能应该避免;但每个人的投资风格各有不同。 在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是一个开始的地方。 但最终,每家公司都可能存在在资产负债表之外的风险。 请注意,the chemours在我们的投资分析中显示出3个警告信号,其中2个是显著的...
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
如果在所有这些之后,您更感兴趣的是具有坚实资产负债表的快速增长公司,那么不要拖延,查看我们的净现金增长股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。