PPL's (NYSE:PPL) Returns On Capital Tell Us There Is Reason To Feel Uneasy
PPL's (NYSE:PPL) Returns On Capital Tell Us There Is Reason To Feel Uneasy
What underlying fundamental trends can indicate that a company might be in decline? When we see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) in conjunction with a declining base of capital employed, that's often how a mature business shows signs of aging. This reveals that the company isn't compounding shareholder wealth because returns are falling and its net asset base is shrinking. So after glancing at the trends within PPL (NYSE:PPL), we weren't too hopeful.
什么潜在的基本趋势可能表明一家公司可能正在衰退?当我们看到资本利用率(ROCE)下降,同时资本利用基数也在下降,这通常是一个成熟企业显示老化迹象的方式。这表明公司并未使股东财富增长,因为回报在下降,净资产基数也在缩小。因此,在研究PPL(纽约证券交易所:PPL)的趋势后,我们并不太乐观。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
上面您可以看到蒙托克可再生能源现行ROCE与之前资本回报的比较,但过去只能知道这么多。如果您感兴趣,可以查看我们免费的蒙托克可再生能源分析师报告,了解分析师的预测。
Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. To calculate this metric for PPL, this is the formula:
只是为了澄清,如果您不确定,ROCE是评估公司在其业务中投资的资本上赚取多少税前收入(以百分比表示)的度量标准。要为PPL计算这个指标,这是公式:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
资本利用率 = 利息和税前利润(EBIT) ÷ (总资产 - 流动负债)
0.05 = US$1.9b ÷ (US$40b - US$2.3b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.05 = 19亿美元 ÷ (400亿美元 - 23亿美元)(基于2024年9月的过去十二个月)。
So, PPL has an ROCE of 5.0%. Even though it's in line with the industry average of 4.8%, it's still a low return by itself.
因此,PPL的ROCE为5.0%。尽管它与行业平均水平4.8%相符,但单独来看仍然是较低的回报。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for PPL compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering PPL for free.
上面你可以看到PPL目前的ROCE与之前的资本回报率相比,但过去只能告诉你这么多。如果你愿意,你可以免费查看分析师对PPL的预测。
What Can We Tell From PPL's ROCE Trend?
从PPL的ROCE趋势我们能得出什么结论呢?
In terms of PPL's historical ROCE movements, the trend doesn't inspire confidence. About five years ago, returns on capital were 7.6%, however they're now substantially lower than that as we saw above. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. Since returns are falling and the business has the same amount of assets employed, this can suggest it's a mature business that hasn't had much growth in the last five years. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on PPL becoming one if things continue as they have.
就PPL历史ROCE走势而言,这一趋势并不令人信心满满。大约五年前,资本回报率为7.6%,然而现在远低于此,正如我们前面所见。除此之外,值得注意的是,企业所使用的资本量保持相对稳定。由于回报率正在下降,而业务所使用的资产仍然相同,这可能表明这是一个在过去五年内没有太多增长的成熟业务。因此,由于这些趋势通常不利于创造成倍增长,如果事情继续下去,我们就不会对PPL成为成倍增长股抱有太大期望。
In Conclusion...
最后,同等资本下回报率较低的趋势通常不是我们关注创业板股票的最佳信号。由于这些发展进行良好,因此投资者不太可能表现友好。自五年前以来,该股下跌了32%。除非这些指标朝着更积极的轨迹转变,否则我们将继续寻找其他股票。
In summary, it's unfortunate that PPL is generating lower returns from the same amount of capital. Investors must expect better things on the horizon though because the stock has risen 27% in the last five years. Regardless, we don't like the trends as they are and if they persist, we think you might find better investments elsewhere.
总之,不幸的是,PPL从同等资本中产生了更低的回报。投资者必须期待未来会有更好的情况,因为股价在过去五年中上涨了27%。尽管如此,我们不喜欢当前的趋势,如果它们继续存在,我们认为你可能会在别处找到更好的投资机会。
One more thing to note, we've identified 2 warning signs with PPL and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
还有一件事要注意,我们已经发现了PPL存在2个警告信号,了解它们应该成为你的投资过程的一部分。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果您想寻找财务状况良好、回报卓越的实力强企业,可以免费查看以下公司列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。