Following a 24% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Matthews International Corporation (NASDAQ:MATW) Institutional Owners
Following a 24% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Matthews International Corporation (NASDAQ:MATW) Institutional Owners
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Matthews International implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 53% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 机构在马修国际的大量持股意味着它们对公司股价有着重大影响
- 前8大股东持有该公司53%的股份。
- 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。
Every investor in Matthews International Corporation (NASDAQ:MATW) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
纳斯达克马修国际公司(NASDAQ:MATW)的每位投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。 机构拥有83%的股份,在公司中拥有最大的股份。 也就是说,如果股价上涨,该群体将受益最多(或者如果出现下行,则会损失最多)。
After a year of 24% losses, last week's 7.5% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.
经过一年24%的亏损后,上周7.5%的增长将受到机构投资者的欢迎,可能表明回报率可能开始上升。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Matthews International.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关马修国际的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Matthews International?
机构持股能告诉我们有关马修国际的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Matthews International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Matthews International's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
马修国际已经有机构出现在股东名册上。确实,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定可信度。但我们不能仅凭这一事实就依赖于它,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人都会一样。 如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看一下马修国际以下的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Matthews International. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 15%. With 11% and 5.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Joseph Bartolacci is the owner of 1.5% of the company's shares.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有超过公司一半的股份,因此他们可以集体行使重要权力。我们注意到对于马修国际来说,对冲基金并没有一项实质性的投资。该公司最大的股东是黑石集团,持有15%的股份。第二和第三大股东分别是先锋集团和哥伦比亚管理投资顾问公司,持有11%和5.5%的流通股。此外,首席执行官Joseph Bartolacci拥有公司1.5%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进行了进一步的调查,发现前8大股东占注册股份的大约53%,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。虽然该公司有一些分析师关注,但它可能没有得到广泛关注。因此,它可能在未来得到更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of Matthews International
马修国际的内部持股权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Matthews International Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$737m, and insiders have US$31m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以报告说,内部人确实持有马修国际公司的股份。其市值仅为73700万美元,并且内部人以自己的名义持有3100万美元的股份。这至少显示出某种程度的一致性。您可以单击此处查看这些内部人是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Matthews International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众(通常是个人投资者)持有马修国际的13%股份。虽然这个群体不一定能左右公司的决策,但肯定能对公司的运营产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Matthews International (of which 2 are a bit concerning!) you should know about.
尽管考虑拥有公司的不同团体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。比如风险。每家公司都有风险,我们已经发现马修国际有3个警示迹象(其中2个有点令人担忧!)这些都是您应该了解的。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。