The Past Three-year Earnings Decline for Dymatic ChemicalsInc (SZSE:002054) Likely Explains Shareholders Long-term Losses
The Past Three-year Earnings Decline for Dymatic ChemicalsInc (SZSE:002054) Likely Explains Shareholders Long-term Losses
It is a pleasure to report that the Dymatic Chemicals,Inc. (SZSE:002054) is up 36% in the last quarter. But that cannot eclipse the less-than-impressive returns over the last three years. In fact, the share price is down 30% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return.
很高兴地向大家报告,Dymatic Chemicals, Inc.(深圳证券交易所:002054)在上个季度上涨了36%。但这并不能掩盖过去三年来不那么令人印象深刻的回报。实际上,股价在过去三年中下跌了30%,远低于市场回报率。
While the last three years has been tough for Dymatic ChemicalsInc shareholders, this past week has shown signs of promise. So let's look at the longer term fundamentals and see if they've been the driver of the negative returns.
尽管过去三年对Dymatic ChemicalSinc的股东来说是艰难的,但过去一周显示出希望的迹象。因此,让我们来看看长期基本面,看看它们是否是负回报的驱动力。
While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.
虽然市场是一种强大的定价机制,但股价反映了投资者的情绪,而不仅仅是潜在的业务表现。评估公司情绪变化的一种有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。
Dymatic ChemicalsInc saw its EPS decline at a compound rate of 35% per year, over the last three years. In comparison the 11% compound annual share price decline isn't as bad as the EPS drop-off. So, despite the prior disappointment, shareholders must have some confidence the situation will improve, longer term. With a P/E ratio of 63.43, it's fair to say the market sees a brighter future for the business.
在过去三年中,Dymatic ChemicalSinc的每股收益以每年35%的复合速度下降。相比之下,11%的复合年股价下跌幅度没有每股收益的下降那么严重。因此,尽管此前曾令人失望,但股东必须有一定的信心,从长远来看,情况会有所改善。市盈率为63.43,可以公平地说,市场看到了该业务更光明的未来。
The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
下图描述了 EPS 随着时间的推移是如何变化的(点击图片可以看到确切的值)。
It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on Dymatic ChemicalsInc's earnings, revenue and cash flow.
可能值得一看我们关于Dymatic ChemicalSinc的收益、收入和现金流的免费报告。
What About Dividends?
那股息呢?
It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. As it happens, Dymatic ChemicalsInc's TSR for the last 3 years was -27%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.
重要的是要考虑任何给定股票的股东总回报率和股价回报率。基于股息再投资的假设,股东总回报率纳入了任何分拆或贴现资本筹集的价值以及任何股息。因此,对于支付丰厚股息的公司来说,股东总回报率通常远高于股价回报率。碰巧的是,Dymatic ChemicalSinc在过去三年的股东总回报率为-27%,超过了前面提到的股价回报率。因此,公司支付的股息提高了股东的总回报率。
A Different Perspective
不同的视角
While the broader market gained around 7.6% in the last year, Dymatic ChemicalsInc shareholders lost 13% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 1.5% per year over five years. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Dymatic ChemicalsInc you should be aware of, and 2 of them make us uncomfortable.
尽管去年整体市场上涨了约7.6%,但Dymatic ChemicalSinc的股东损失了13%(甚至包括股息)。即使是优质股票的股价有时也会下跌,但我们希望在过于感兴趣之前看到企业基本指标的改善。遗憾的是,去年的业绩结束了糟糕的表现,股东在五年内每年面临1.5%的总亏损。我们意识到罗斯柴尔德男爵曾说过,投资者应该 “在街头流血时买入”,但我们警告说,投资者应首先确保他们购买的是高质量的企业。我发现将长期股价视为业务绩效的代表非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。一个很好的例子:我们发现了你应该注意的4个Dymatic ChemicalSinc的警告信号,其中两个让我们感到不舒服。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings.
当然,通过寻找其他地方,你可能会找到一项不错的投资。因此,看看这份我们预计收益将增长的免费公司名单。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Chinese exchanges.
请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在中国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报率。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。