share_log

The Recent CN¥795m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Wanma Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300698)

The Recent CN¥795m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Wanma Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300698)

最近人民币79500万的市值下降可能导致投资万马科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300698)的内部人员感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/23 08:13

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Wanma Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The top 4 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 万马科技的显著内部持股表明对公司扩展的内在利益
  • 前4个股东拥有公司的51%股权。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Wanma Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300698), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了万马科技有限公司(深交所:300698),了解业务的所有权结构是很重要的。我们可以看到,个人内部人士在公司中拥有57%的股份,这意味着,如果股票上涨,该集团将获得最大的收益(如果出现下跌,他们将损失最多)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥795m.

因此,内部人士作为一个群体在市值下降了79500万人民币后遭受了最大的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Wanma Technology.

在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于万马科技的不同股权结构。

big
SZSE:300698 Ownership Breakdown November 23rd 2024
深交所:300698 股权分布 2024年11月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Wanma Technology?

机构持股对万马科技的意义是什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

Less than 5% of Wanma Technology is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.

万马科技的机构投资者所持股份不足5%。这暗示了一些基金已将该公司纳入视野,但许多基金尚未购买其股票。因此,如果公司本身能够随着时间的推移而改进,我们可能会在未来看到更多的机构买家。当多个机构投资者想要买入股票时,我们通常会看到股价上涨。过去的营业收入轨迹(见下文)可以作为未来增长的一个指标,但并没有保证。

big
SZSE:300698 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 23rd 2024
深交所:300698 2024年11月23日的盈利和营收增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Wanma Technology. Our data shows that Desheng Zhang is the largest shareholder with 22% of shares outstanding. With 15% and 9.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Tao Sheng and Heyang Zhang are the second and third largest shareholders. Heyang Zhang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

对冲基金在万马科技的持股不多。我们的数据显示,张德胜是最大股东,持有22%的流通股。第二和第三大股东分别是持有15%和9.2%流通股的陶生和张会扬。第三大股东张会扬恰好也是董事会主席。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究还揭示了这样一个事实:大约51%的公司由前4个股东控制,这表明这些所有者在业务上拥有重大影响力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Wanma Technology

万马科技的内部持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Wanma Technology Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of CN¥4.9b, that means they have CN¥2.8b worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

看起来内幕人士持有万马科技有限公司超过一半的股票。这使他们拥有很大的权力。考虑到市值为人民币49亿,这意味着他们持有价值人民币28亿的股份。大多数人会认为这是一种积极的表现,显示出与股东的强烈一致性。您可以点击这里查看这些内幕人士是否有买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Wanma Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众的持有比例达40%,大多数由个人投资者组成,对万马科技有一定程度的影响力。这种持股规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大型股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Wanma Technology (at least 1 which is concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体是很有价值的,但还有其他因素更为重要。 比如,投资风险这一不容忽视的因素。 我们已经确定了万马科技的3个警示信号(其中至少有1个令人担忧),理解这些信号应该成为您投资过程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发