share_log

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE:PH) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 84% of the Company

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE:PH) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 84% of the Company

纽交所上市公司Parker-Hannifin Corporation(NYSE:PH)受到持有公司84%股份的机构投资者青睐
Simply Wall St ·  11/24 20:39

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Parker-Hannifin's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 49% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,帕克-汉尼芬的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 共有25名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为49%
  • 内部人士最近的销售情况

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE:PH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 84% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解谁真正控制了派克汉尼芬公司(纽约证券交易所代码:PH),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。机构拥有84%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由于机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者而言。因此,向公司投资的大量机构资金通常被视为积极属性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Parker-Hannifin.

在下图中,我们放大了帕克-汉尼芬的不同所有权组。

big
NYSE:PH Ownership Breakdown November 24th 2024
纽约证券交易所:PH 所有权明细 2024 年 11 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Parker-Hannifin?

关于派克-汉尼芬,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Parker-Hannifin. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Parker-Hannifin's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者持有帕克-汉尼芬的大量股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Parker-Hannifin的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

big
NYSE:PH Earnings and Revenue Growth November 24th 2024
纽约证券交易所:PH 收益和收入增长 2024 年 11 月 24 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Parker-Hannifin. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 8.3% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.6% and 4.8% of the stock.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对帕克-汉尼芬进行有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大股东,已发行股份的8.3%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约6.6%和4.8%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我们的所有权数据表明,前25名股东总共持有不到登记册的一半,这表明一大批小股东没有单一股东占多数。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Parker-Hannifin

帕克-汉尼芬的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that Parker-Hannifin Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$447m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的信息表明,派克汉尼芬公司内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。由于规模如此之大,我们预计内部人士不会拥有很大一部分股票。他们共拥有4.47亿美元的股票。很高兴看到董事会成员拥有股票,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Parker-Hannifin. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有派克-汉尼芬15%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Parker-Hannifin is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。请注意,Parker-Hannifin在我们的投资分析中显示了两个警告信号,您应该知道...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发