Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as JOYY Inc.'s (NASDAQ:YY) Recent US$157m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as JOYY Inc.'s (NASDAQ:YY) Recent US$157m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in JOYY implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders own 42% of JOYY
- 机构对欢聚的大量持有意味着他们对公司股价有显著影响
- 总共有5位投资者拥有该公司51%的所有权。
- 内部人士持有欢聚42%的股份
Every investor in JOYY Inc. (NASDAQ:YY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 43% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位欢聚公司(纳斯达克:YY)的投资者都应该关注最强大的股东群体。 持有公司最多股份的群体,大约占43%,是机构。 也就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体将受益最多(如果出现下跌则损失最多)。
And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.9b last week after a 7.5% drop in the share price. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 19% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell JOYY, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
因此,机构投资者在公司市值上周因股价下跌7.5%而降至19亿美元后成为受影响最严重的群体。这些投资者可能特别担心当前的损失,这导致股东的年损失达19%。这些被称为“聪明资金”的机构对股票价格的波动有很大影响。因此,如果下跌趋势持续,机构可能面临卖出欢聚的压力,这可能对个人投资者产生负面影响。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of JOYY, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解欢聚每种类型的所有者,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About JOYY?
机构所有权对欢聚有什么启示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in JOYY. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of JOYY, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在欢聚中拥有相当的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出错误的投资,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图出售一只股票,通常会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,查看欢聚过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(如下所示)。当然,记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in JOYY. Our data shows that Xueling Li is the largest shareholder with 32% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 3.8% of the stock.
我们注意到对欢聚的对冲基金没有进行 meaningful 投资。我们的数据表明,李学玲是最大的股东,持有32%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约11%和3.8%的股票。
On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
进一步观察后,我们发现前五大股东拥有该公司51%的股份。换句话说,这些股东在公司的决策中有很大的发言权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of JOYY
欢聚的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of JOYY Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$819m stake in this US$1.9b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
看来内部人士持有欢聚公司相当大的股份。 看到内部人士在这个19亿美金的业务中持有高达81900万美元的股份非常有趣。 大多数人会高兴地看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望查看这个免费的图表,显示内部人士最近的交易。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in JOYY. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众一般是个体投资者,持有欢聚15%的股份。 虽然这个群体不一定能决定一切,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for JOYY you should be aware of.
我觉得查看谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 举个例子:我们发现了关于欢聚的两个警示信号,你应该注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。