share_log

Matthew Calkins Appian Corporation's (NASDAQ:APPN) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 5.8%last Week

Matthew Calkins Appian Corporation's (NASDAQ:APPN) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 5.8%last Week

Matthew Calkins是appian公司(纳斯达克:APPN)的CEO,是最看好的内部人,他们的股票价值上周增长了5.8%
Simply Wall St ·  11/24 21:36

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Appian's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 54% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • 31% of Appian is held by Institutions
  • appian的显著内部所有权表明对公司扩张的固有利益
  • 前两大股东持有该企业54%的股份。
  • 机构持有appian 31%的股份

A look at the shareholders of Appian Corporation (NASDAQ:APPN) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 44% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下Appian Corporation(纳斯达克:APPN)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有影响力。持有公司股份最多的群体,确切地说约占44%,是个人内部人士。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 5.8% gain.

因此,内部人士成为上周5.8%收益的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Appian, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入了解Appian的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
NasdaqGM:APPN Ownership Breakdown November 24th 2024
NasdaqGM:APPN所有权拆分 2024年11月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Appian?

机构持股告诉我们关于Appian的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Appian already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Appian's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Appian已经有机构在股东名册上。事实上,他们在公司拥有一定的股份。这表明在专业投资者中享有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为有时机构也会犯错误投资,就像其他人一样。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下Appian下面的收入历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGM:APPN Earnings and Revenue Growth November 24th 2024
NasdaqGM:APPN 2024年11月24日盈利和营业收入增长

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 14% of Appian. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's CEO Matthew Calkins is the largest shareholder with 40% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 14% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

我们的数据显示,对appian拥有14%股份的是对冲基金。这一点值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是非常活跃的投资者,他们可能试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期看到价值创造(以及更高的股价)。公司首席执行官马修·卡尔金斯持有流通股的40%,是最大的股东。为了更清楚,第二大股东持有流通股约14%,其次是第三大股东持有6.9%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

经过进一步挖掘,我们发现前两个股东共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,说明他们有相当大的影响力来影响公司的决策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Appian

Appian的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Appian Corporation. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$1.2b stake in this US$2.8b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最近的数据显示,内部人士拥有appian公司相当比例的股份。看到内部人士在这家28亿美元的公司中拥有价值12亿美元的股份是非常有趣的。看到这种投资水平是很好的。您可以在这里检查,看看这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Appian. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公众,通常是个人投资者,在appian持有11%的股份。尽管这个群体不能必然决定事情,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Appian has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如风险-Appian有1个警告标志,我们认为您应该注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发