Institutional Investors in GRAIL, Inc. (NASDAQ:GRAL) Have Had a Wonderful Week After Share Price Increased 12%
Institutional Investors in GRAIL, Inc. (NASDAQ:GRAL) Have Had a Wonderful Week After Share Price Increased 12%
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in GRAIL implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 8 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 机构在GRAIL的 substantial 持有意味着他们对公司股价有显著影响。
- 前8大股东拥有该公司的51%。
- 最近由内部人士出售。
A look at the shareholders of GRAIL, Inc. (NASDAQ:GRAL) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看GRAIL公司的股东(纳斯达克:GRAL)可以告诉我们哪个集团最有权势。我们可以看到,机构在公司中拥有48%的股份。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。
Clearly, institutional investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$57m last week.
显然,机构投资者在公司市值上周增长5700万美元后受益最大。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about GRAIL.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于GRAIL的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GRAIL?
机构持股告诉我们关于GRAIL什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in GRAIL. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of GRAIL, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在GRAIL中拥有相当一部分股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师查看了这只股票,并且他们喜欢它。但是和其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查一下GRAIL过去的盈利轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Our data indicates that hedge funds own 8.9% of GRAIL. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Illumina, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. CRCM L.P. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Sessa Capital IM, L.P. holds about 8.9% of the company stock.
我们的数据表明,对冲基金拥有GRAIL 8.9%的股份。这引起了我的注意,因为对冲基金有时会试图影响管理层,或带来能够为股东创造短期价值的变革。Illumina, Inc.目前是公司最大的股东,持有13%的流通股。CRCm L.P.是第二大股东,拥有11%的普通股,而Sessa Capital Im, L.P.持有大约8.9%的公司股份。
We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
内部人员拥有佛山蓝火箭电子股份有限公司的重要比例。内部人员在这家69亿元人民币的企业中持有25亿元人民币的股份,看到内部人员如此投资是很好的。如果这些内部人员最近一直在购买,那就值得检查。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
虽然研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师情绪来了解风向也是有意义的。虽然有些股票受到分析师的关注,但该公司可能并未受到广泛关注。因此,它可能在路上获得更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of GRAIL
GRAIL内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that GRAIL, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It has a market capitalization of just US$555m, and the board has only US$3.9m worth of shares in their own names. Many investors in smaller companies prefer to see the board more heavily invested. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息显示,GRAIL, Inc. 的内部人士拥有不到1%的股份。 该公司的市值仅为55500万美元,而董事会在自己名下的股份仅价值390万美元。许多小公司的投资者更希望看到董事会有更多投资。您可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否有买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,包括散户投资者,在该公司拥有19%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个群体不能决定大局,但它肯定会对公司的经营产生实际影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
Private equity firms hold a 11% stake in GRAIL. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
股权投资公司持有GRAIL 11%的股份。这表明他们可能在关键政策决策中发挥影响力。有些人可能会喜欢这样,因为股权投资有时会成为行动主义者,让管理层负责。但有时,股权投资在将公司上市后会选择退出。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
It appears to us that public companies own 13% of GRAIL. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我们认为上市公司拥有GRAIL 13%的股份。我们不能确定,但这很可能是一个战略性股份。这些业务可能相似,或合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - GRAIL has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,GRAIL有2个我们认为你应该注意的警告信号。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。