While Institutions Own 23% of Kingnet Network Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002517), Retail Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 46% Ownership
While Institutions Own 23% of Kingnet Network Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002517), Retail Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 46% Ownership
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Kingnet Network by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 49% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders own 21% of Kingnet Network
- 零售投资者对恺英网络的重要控制权意味着普通大众有更多的权力来影响管理和治理决策
- 前25名股东持有49%的业务。
- 内部人士拥有恺英网络21%的股份
A look at the shareholders of Kingnet Network Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002517) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 46% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下恺英网络股份有限公司(SZSE:002517)的股东,就可以了解哪个群体最具影响力。零售投资者拥有该公司46%的股份,即意味着该群体将从对公司的投资中获得最大收益(或损失最大)
And institutions on the other hand have a 23% ownership in the company. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones.
另一方面,机构在公司中拥有23%的所有权。 机构通常会持有较大公司的股票,而我们预计会看到内部人士拥有较小公司的显着比例。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Kingnet Network.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对恺英网络可以告诉我们什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kingnet Network?
关于恺英网络,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Kingnet Network does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Kingnet Network's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到恺英网络确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司股份的很大一部分。 这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为有时机构也会犯错误的投资,就像每个人都会一样。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总是存在它们陷入“挤碎式交易”的风险。当这种交易失败时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。 你可以在下面看到恺英网络的历史收入和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更丰富多彩的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Kingnet Network. The company's largest shareholder is Feng Jin, with ownership of 15%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.3% and 2.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
对恺英网络来说,套期基金持有的股票并不多。该公司最大的股东是冯津,持股15%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股的5.3%和2.8%。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Kingnet Network
恺英网络的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Kingnet Network Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥5.9b worth of shares in the CN¥28b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我们的信息表明,内部持有恺英网络有限公司的股份。 内部人士在这家价值280亿元人民币的公司中持有59亿元人民币的股份。 这是相当重要的。 大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。 您可能希望查看最近内部人员交易的免费图表。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 46% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Kingnet Network. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
拥有46%股权的普通民众,主要由个人投资者组成,在恺英网络拥有一定的影响力。 虽然这个群体不能必然左右决策,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生实质性影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 8.1%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们的数据显示,私人公司持有公司股份的8.1%。 或许值得深入研究。如果相关方,如内部人员,在这些私人公司中拥有利益,那么应在年度报告中披露。私人公司也可能对公司有战略兴趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Kingnet Network better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Kingnet Network .
总是值得考虑公司股东的不同群体。但要更好地了解恺英网络,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您应该注意我们发现的关于恺英网络的1个警告信号。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。