share_log

Institutional Investors Are Uber Technologies, Inc.'s (NYSE:UBER) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$4.6b Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are Uber Technologies, Inc.'s (NYSE:UBER) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$4.6b Market Cap Gain

机构投资者是优步科技公司(纽交所:UBER)最大的投资者,并在上周市值增加了46亿美元后获得了回报。
Simply Wall St ·  11/25 18:30

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Uber Technologies implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 18 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 各机构对Uber Technologies的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 共有18名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为50%
  • 业内人士最近一直在抛售

A look at the shareholders of Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 84% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看优步科技公司(纽约证券交易所代码:UBER)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为84%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 3.1% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 28% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

结果,在上周公司股价上涨3.1%之后,机构投资者获得了最大的回报。目前,一年的投资回报率为28%,上周的收益本来会非常受欢迎。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Uber Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Uber Technologies的每种类型的所有者。

big
NYSE:UBER Ownership Breakdown November 25th 2024
纽约证券交易所:优步所有权明细 2024 年 11 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Uber Technologies?

关于Uber Technologies,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Uber Technologies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Uber Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Uber Technologies已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Uber Technologies过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:UBER Earnings and Revenue Growth November 25th 2024
纽约证券交易所:优步收益和收入增长 2024 年 11 月 25 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Uber Technologies. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 8.5% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Uber Technologies进行有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大股东,已发行股份的8.5%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约7.0%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有4.5%的所有权。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 18 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现排名前18位的合计持有该公司的50%所有权,这表明没有一个单一股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Uber Technologies

优步科技的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our information suggests that Uber Technologies, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$218m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的信息表明,Uber Technologies, Inc.内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。由于它是一家大公司,我们只期望内部人士拥有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值2.18亿美元的股票。看到至少有一部分内部所有权总是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司16%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Uber Technologies better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Uber Technologies .

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解优步科技,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,你应该注意我们在Uber Technologies上发现的3个警告信号。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发