With 83% Institutional Ownership, Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 83% Institutional Ownership, Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Alliant Energy implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 机构在美国联合能源的巨大持股意味着他们对公司股票价格有重要影响。
- 前12个股东持有业务的51%。
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看美国联合能源公司(纳斯达克:LNT)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。机构持有83%的股份,这使他们在公司中拥有最多的股票。换句话说,这个群体在对公司的投资中最有可能获得(或失去)收益。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由于机构业主拥有巨额资源和流动性资产,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的影响力,尤其是对个人投资者。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于一家公司通常被视为一种理想的特征。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Alliant Energy.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了美国联合能源的不同持有群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alliant Energy?
机构持股对美国联合能源有什么启示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Alliant Energy. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Alliant Energy's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在美国联合能源中持有相当数量的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经对该股票进行了分析,并且他们对其表示认可。但和其他人一样,他们也可能会犯错。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面美国联合能源的盈余历史。当然,未来才是最重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Alliant Energy is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 13%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.0% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 6.3% of the company stock.
投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司的一半以上,因此他们可以共同拥有显著的权力。美国联合能源并不被对冲基金所拥有。该公司的最大股东是先锋集团,拥有13%的股份。黑岩公司是第二大股东,拥有9.0%的普通股, 道富银行全球顾问公司大约持有该公司6.3%的股票。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
考虑到前12名股东拥有51%的股份,这意味着没有单一的股东拥有多数。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Alliant Energy
美国联合能源的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that Alliant Energy Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$32m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的信息显示,美国联合能源公司内部人士拥有该公司的股份不足1%。由于这是一家大型公司,我们只期望内部人士拥有小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值3200万美元的股票。总是好的看到至少有一些内部持股,但可能值得检查这些内部人士是否在卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众(包括零售投资者)拥有公司17%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然这种拥有量相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Alliant Energy better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Alliant Energy (1 doesn't sit too well with us) that you should be aware of.
了解拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得思考。但要更好地了解美国联合能源,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。比如,我们已经发现美国联合能源有2个警告信号(其中一个令我们感到不太舒服),你应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。