share_log

Hitevision Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002955) Market Cap Increased by CN¥655m, Insiders Receive a 38% Cut

Hitevision Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002955) Market Cap Increased by CN¥655m, Insiders Receive a 38% Cut

海泰视觉股份有限公司(SZSE:002955)的市值增加了655000000元,内部人士获得了38%的分成。
Simply Wall St ·  11/26 08:32

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant insider control over Hitevision implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 4 shareholders own 54% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Hitevision is 18%
  • 显著的内部控制意味着对海康威视公司增长的既得利益
  • 前4大股东拥有公司的54%。
  • 海康威视的机构持股为18%

Every investor in Hitevision Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002955) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 38% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每位海康威视有限公司(深交所:002955)的投资者都应该了解最强大的股东团体。我们可以看到,内部个人股东在公司中拥有38%的股份。这意味着,如果股票上涨,这个团体将获得最大的利益(或者如果出现下跌,将损失最多)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥655m last week.

显然,在公司市值上升了65500万人民币后,内部人员获得了最大的利益。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Hitevision.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了Hitevision的不同股权群体。

big
SZSE:002955 Ownership Breakdown November 26th 2024
SZSE:002955 所有权分布 2024年11月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hitevision?

机构持股告诉我们关于Hitevision什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hitevision. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Hitevision, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在Hitevision中持有相当数量的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师关注了这只股票,并且喜欢它。但和其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出同一只股票,看到股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,查看Hitevision过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,也要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
SZSE:002955 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 26th 2024
SZSE:002955 2024年11月26日的营业收入和增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hitevision. The company's largest shareholder is Hongfu Victory Company Limited, with ownership of 18%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 15% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 11% by the third-largest shareholder. Jing Wang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

我们注意到对冲基金在海天视觉没有重要投资。公司的最大股东是香港福胜有限公司,拥有18%的股份。作为对比,第二大股东持有约15%的流通股份,第三大股东持有11%的股份。第三大股东靖王也是董事会成员。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 54% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究还揭示,大约54%的公司由前4大股东控制,表明这些所有者对业务具有重要影响力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。虽然该公司有一些分析师关注,但它可能没有得到广泛关注。因此,它可能在未来得到更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of Hitevision

海天视觉的内部持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hitevision Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥2.5b stake in this CN¥6.5b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有正当比例的海天视觉有限公司的股份。内部人士在这家市值65亿人民币的公司中持有25亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有大量的股份。您可以点击这里查看他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公众,包括普通投资者,在公司拥有27%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽视。虽然这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面左右政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 18%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我认为,查看公司所有者的确切信息非常有趣。 但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 请注意,养元饮品在我们的投资分析中显示了2个警告信号,您应该知道...

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人觉得深入了解一家公司过去的表现是有用的。您可以访问此详细的过去收益、营业收入和现金流量图。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发