share_log

Capital Allocation Trends At Minth Group (HKG:425) Aren't Ideal

Capital Allocation Trends At Minth Group (HKG:425) Aren't Ideal

敏实集团(HKG:425)的资金配置趋势并不理想
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/26 11:34

Did you know there are some financial metrics that can provide clues of a potential multi-bagger? Typically, we'll want to notice a trend of growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and alongside that, an expanding base of capital employed. This shows us that it's a compounding machine, able to continually reinvest its earnings back into the business and generate higher returns. However, after briefly looking over the numbers, we don't think Minth Group (HKG:425) has the makings of a multi-bagger going forward, but let's have a look at why that may be.

您是否知道有一些财务指标可以提供潜在的多倍收益迹象?通常,我们会注意到资本利用率(ROCE)不断增长的趋势,以及与之同时增长的资本基础。这向我们表明这是一个复利机器,能够不断地将其收益重新投资到业务中,并产生更高的回报。然而,简要查看数字后,我们认为敏实集团(HKG:425)未来可能不具备多倍收益迹象,但让我们看看可能的原因。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

我们对 Enphase Energy 的资本雇用回报率的看法:正如我们上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的资本回报率没有提高,但它正在重新投资于业务。投资者必须认为未来会有更好的前景,因为股票表现良好,使持股五年以上的股东获得了 690% 的收益。最终,如果基本趋势持续存在,我们不会对它成为一只多头股持有期很久很有信心。

If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Minth Group:

如果您之前没有接触过ROCE,它衡量了公司从其业务中使用的资本获得的“回报”(税前利润)。 分析师使用这个公式为敏实集团计算它:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

资本利用率 = 利息和税前利润(EBIT) ÷ (总资产 - 流动负债)

0.089 = CN¥2.2b ÷ (CN¥39b - CN¥14b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

0.089 = 2200000000人民币 ÷ (39000000000人民币 - 14000000000人民币)(基于2024年6月的最近十二个月)。

Thus, Minth Group has an ROCE of 8.9%. On its own that's a low return, but compared to the average of 6.5% generated by the Auto Components industry, it's much better.

因此,敏实集团的ROCE为8.9%。 单独来看,这是一个较低的回报,但与汽车元件行业平均6.5%的回报相比,要好得多。

big
SEHK:425 Return on Capital Employed November 26th 2024
SEHK:425资本雇用回报2024年11月26日

In the above chart we have measured Minth Group's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Minth Group .

在上面的图表中,我们已经测量了敏实集团的先前资本回报率与其先前的绩效,但未来可能更为重要。如果您想了解分析师对未来的预测,请查看我们为敏实集团提供的免费分析师报告。

So How Is Minth Group's ROCE Trending?

那么敏实集团的资本回报率是如何趋势的?

When we looked at the ROCE trend at Minth Group, we didn't gain much confidence. To be more specific, ROCE has fallen from 13% over the last five years. Although, given both revenue and the amount of assets employed in the business have increased, it could suggest the company is investing in growth, and the extra capital has led to a short-term reduction in ROCE. And if the increased capital generates additional returns, the business, and thus shareholders, will benefit in the long run.

当我们查看敏实集团的资本回报率趋势时,并没有让我们太有信心。具体来说,过去五年中资本回报率已经下降了13%。尽管营业收入和企业所使用的资产数量都在增加,这可能表明公司正在进行投资以实现增长,而额外的资本导致了资本回报率的短期减少。如果增加的资本带来额外的回报,业务和股东将从中受益。

Our Take On Minth Group's ROCE

我们对敏实集团的资本回报率看法

In summary, despite lower returns in the short term, we're encouraged to see that Minth Group is reinvesting for growth and has higher sales as a result. These growth trends haven't led to growth returns though, since the stock has fallen 46% over the last five years. So we think it'd be worthwhile to look further into this stock given the trends look encouraging.

总的来说,尽管短期内回报较低,但我们很高兴看到敏实集团正在为增长进行再投资,并因此销售额增加。这些增长趋势并未带来回报增长,因为股票在过去五年中下跌了46%。因此,我们认为值得进一步研究该股票,鉴于趋势看起来令人鼓舞。

If you're still interested in Minth Group it's worth checking out our FREE intrinsic value approximation for 425 to see if it's trading at an attractive price in other respects.

如果您仍然对敏实集团感兴趣,不妨查看我们为425个公司提供的免费内在价值估算,以查看其在其他方面是否以有吸引力的价格交易。

While Minth Group isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.

虽然敏实集团的回报率不是最高的,请查看这份免费的公司清单,这些公司在股权回报率和稳健资产负债表上都表现出色。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发