Okta, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OKTA) Institutional Shareholders Had a Great Week as One-year Returns Increased After a 5.0% Gain Last Week
Okta, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OKTA) Institutional Shareholders Had a Great Week as One-year Returns Increased After a 5.0% Gain Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Okta's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 考虑到机构在股票中拥有的大量股份,okta的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 前13名股东占该公司50%的股份。
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
A look at the shareholders of Okta, Inc. (NASDAQ:OKTA) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 85% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看Okta, Inc. (纳斯达克:okta) 的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。我们可以看到,机构在公司中拥有85%的股份。这意味着,如果股票上涨,该群体将获得最大的利益(或者在下跌时损失最多)。
Last week's 5.0% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 8.9% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上周的5.0%的涨幅意味着,尽管公司显示出强劲的长期趋势,但机构投资者仍处于积极的一端。目前,股东的年度回报为8.9%,上周的涨幅更是锦上添花。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Okta.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了okta的不同股东群体。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bc61/7bc61e5f32fa9d0d7a3b6ed46b874684d88c9e41" alt="big"
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Okta?
机构持股告诉我们关于okta什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Okta already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Okta's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
okta已经在股份登记册上有机构投资者。实际上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经看过这只股票,并且看好它。但和其他人一样,他们也可能会犯错。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总是存在它们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会争相快速出售股票。此风险在没有成长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到okta的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是还有更多的内容。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/651e5/651e520329c7b1d4f6c0f870152c659787f1548f" alt="big"
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Okta is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is FMR LLC, with ownership of 10%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Todd McKinnon is the owner of 3.6% of the company's shares.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。okta并不被对冲基金持有。公司的最大股东是FMR LLC,持有10%的股份。与此同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有10%和5.9%的流通股份。此外,首席执行官Todd McKinnon持有公司3.6%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
在我们的所有权数字中仔细看看,前13名股东拥有的股权合计为50%,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of Okta
okta的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Okta, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$651m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.
股东们可能会对内部人士拥有okta公司股票感兴趣。这是一家非常大的公司,董事会成员 collectively 拥有价值65100万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。我们有时会关注他们是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Okta. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众拥有10%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,对okta有一定程度的影响力。虽然这个群体不一定能主导,但他们确实可以对公司的运行产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Okta better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Okta .
考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得思考的。但要更好地理解okta,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您应该注意到我们发现的okta的一个警告信号。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。