Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Traeger, Inc. (NYSE:COOK) With 36% Ownership
Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Traeger, Inc. (NYSE:COOK) With 36% Ownership
Key Insights
关键见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Traeger implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 3 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 机构对Traeger的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
- 前三名股东拥有公司50%的股份
- 使用分析师预测的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现
If you want to know who really controls Traeger, Inc. (NYSE:COOK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 36% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制了Traeger, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:COOK),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为36%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$385m in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 41%.
上周,在该公司的市值达到3.85亿美元之后,机构投资者最终受益最大。上周的涨势将进一步提振目前为41%的股东一年回报率。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Traeger.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Traeger的什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Traeger?
关于Traeger,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。
Traeger already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Traeger's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Traeger已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Traeger的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Traeger. AEA Investors LP is currently the largest shareholder, with 26% of shares outstanding. With 19% and 5.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board and Jeremy Andrus are the second and third largest shareholders. Jeremy Andrus, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
对冲基金在Traeger中的股票不多。AEA Investors LP目前是最大股东,已发行股份的26%。安大略省教师养老金计划委员会和杰里米·安德鲁斯分别拥有19%和5.9%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。第三大股东杰里米·安德鲁斯也恰好拥有董事会主席的头衔。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 50% stake.
对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,前三名股东通过其50%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Traeger
Traeger 的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Traeger, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$28m worth of the US$385m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有Traeger, Inc.的股份。作为个人,内部人士共同拥有这家3.85亿美元公司的价值2800万美元。这至少显示出一定的对齐性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Traeger. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
Traeger拥有24%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对Traeger有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股权所有权
Private equity firms hold a 26% stake in Traeger. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股权公司持有特雷格26%的股份。这表明他们可以在关键政策决策中发挥影响力。有时我们会看到私募股权长期存在,但总的来说,它们的投资期限较短,而且顾名思义,对上市公司的投资并不多。一段时间后,他们可能会考虑出售资本并将其重新部署到其他地方。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.8%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们的数据显示,私营公司持有公司6.8%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Traeger , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,以永远存在的投资风险幽灵为例。我们已经向Traeger确定了1个警告信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。