Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (NASDAQ:ISRG) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 87% of the Company
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (NASDAQ:ISRG) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 87% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Intuitive Surgical's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 23 shareholders
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 显著高的机构持有率意味着直觉外科公司的股票价格对他们的交易行为敏感。
- 52%的业务由前23位股东持有。
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
If you want to know who really controls Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (NASDAQ:ISRG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 87% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道谁真正控制了直觉外科公司(纳斯达克:ISRG),那么你需要查看其股份注册的构成。 拥有公司最多股份的团体,准确地说,约占87%,是机构。 换句话说,这个团体将从对公司的投资中获得最大收益(或承受最大损失)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由于机构拥有大量的资金和研究能力,因此机构所有权往往具有相当的分量,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构在一家企业中投资的规模可视为该企业的一项重要资产。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Intuitive Surgical.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于直觉外科公司的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Intuitive Surgical?
机构持股告诉我们关于直觉外科公司的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Intuitive Surgical. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Intuitive Surgical, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如您所见,机构投资者在直觉外科公司拥有相当的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好对依赖机构投资者所带来的假定验证保持谨慎。他们有时候也会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出同一只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,查看一下直觉外科公司的历史收益走势是值得的(见下文)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Intuitive Surgical. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 8.9% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.5% and 4.2% of the stock.
由于机构投资者持有超过一半的发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。我们注意到对直觉外科公司的对冲基金没有实质性的投资。我们的数据显示,先锋集团是最大股东,持有8.9%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东分别持有约8.5%和4.2%的股票。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 23 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过更多挖掘,我们发现前23个股东合计持有51%的股份,这表明没有单一股东对公司有显著控制权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Intuitive Surgical
直觉外科公司的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our information suggests that Intuitive Surgical, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$955m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的信息显示,直觉外科公司内部人士拥有不到1%的公司股份。由于公司规模较大,我们只会期待内部人士拥有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值95500万美元的股票。看到至少一些内部持股总是好的,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Intuitive Surgical. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众,通常是个人投资者,持有直觉外科公司12%的股份。虽然这样的持股规模可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人觉得深入了解一家公司过去的表现是有用的。您可以访问此详细的过去收益、营业收入和现金流量图。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。