share_log

ArcSoft Corporation Limited (SHSE:688088) CEO Deng Hui, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 4.4% Reduction in Holdings Value

ArcSoft Corporation Limited (SHSE:688088) CEO Deng Hui, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 4.4% Reduction in Holdings Value

虹软科技有限公司(SHSE:688088)首席执行官邓辉,公司的最大股东持股价值减少4.4%
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/27 14:41

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in ArcSoft's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 4 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 公司内部人士似乎对虹软科技的增长有浓厚的兴趣,他们拥有相当大比例的所有权。
  • 前4大股东拥有该公司的52%。
  • 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of ArcSoft Corporation Limited (SHSE:688088), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 35% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制着虹软科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688088),重要的是要了解企业的所有权结构。持有最大股份的是拥有35%所有权的个人内部人士。换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥609m.

结果,市值下跌了60900万人民币后,内部人士作为一个团体遭受了最大的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of ArcSoft.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了虹软科技的不同所有权群体。

big
SHSE:688088 Ownership Breakdown November 27th 2024
SHSE:688088所有权详情2024年11月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ArcSoft?

机构持股告诉我们关于虹软科技的什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

We can see that ArcSoft does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ArcSoft's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到虹软科技确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司股份的相当一部分。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。但我们不能单单依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。当多个机构持有一支股票时,总会存在它们参与的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。这种风险在一个没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到虹软科技的历史收入和营业收入,但要记住,故事里总是更多内容。

big
SHSE:688088 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 27th 2024
SHSE:688088在2024年11月27日的收益和营业收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in ArcSoft. With a 35% stake, CEO Deng Hui is the largest shareholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.7% by the third-largest shareholder.

对虹软科技来说,对冲基金持有的股份不多。董事长邓辉持有35%的股份,是最大的股东。为了解情况,第二大股东持有约11%的流通股,第三大股东持有3.7%的股份。

On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步观察发现,前四名股东持有52%的股份。换句话说,这些股东对该公司的决策有重要的发言权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of ArcSoft

虹软科技的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of ArcSoft Corporation Limited. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥13b, and insiders have CN¥4.6b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有虹软科技有限公司相当比例的股份。其市值仅为130亿人民币,内部人士名下持有46亿人民币的股份,这相当重要。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会也在与他们一起投资。您可能希望查看这张展示内部人士最近交易情况的免费图表。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over ArcSoft. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公众拥有虹软科技的34%股份,主要是由个人投资者组成,对虹软科技有一定程度的影响力。虽然持有这一比例的股份可能不足以影响公司政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

With an ownership of 11%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股权公司持有11%的股份,有望在价值创造方面发挥一定的作用。有时候我们看到私募股权公司会长期持有一份股权,但一般来说,他们的投资周期比较短,就如其名称所示,他们很少在上市公司进行投资。过一段时间后,他们可能会寻找卖出股份,将资本重新配置到其他项目上。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 9.9%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到,私营公司拥有已发行股份的9.9%。单单从这个事实本身很难得出任何结论,因此值得进一步了解拥有这些私营公司的是谁。有时内部人员或其他相关方可能通过另外一家私营公司持有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for ArcSoft that you should be aware of.

我觉得了解一家公司的所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们也需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了虹软科技存在 2 个警示信号,你应该注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发