share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE:VEEV) With 81% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE:VEEV) With 81% Ownership

机构投资者对veeva systems inc.(纽交所:VEEV)寄予了很大期望,拥有81%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/28 19:52

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Veeva Systems' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 19 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 机构拥有的股份占比高意味着veeva systems的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感
  • 共有19位投资者拥有该公司51%的所有权
  • 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。

If you want to know who really controls Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE:VEEV), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 81% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道谁真正控制着Veeva Systems Inc.(纽交所:VEEV),那么您必须查看其股东名册的构成。机构拥有81%的股份,是公司中持股最多的。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 7.7% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 31% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

结果,上周公司股票价格上涨7.7%,机构投资者获得最大回报。 目前投资回报率为31%,上周的收益将受到更多欢迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Veeva Systems.

让我们更近距离地看看不同类型的股东对Veeva Systems有何启示。

big
NYSE:VEEV Ownership Breakdown November 28th 2024
纽交所:VEEV所有权拆分2024年11月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Veeva Systems?

机构持股对Veeva Systems有何启示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that Veeva Systems does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Veeva Systems, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,Veeva Systems确实拥有机构投资者;他们持有公司的大部分股票。这可能表明公司在投资社区有一定的信誉度。然而,最好要警惕依赖所谓的机构投资者带来的验证。他们有时也会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时尝试抛售一支股票,很常见看到股价大幅下跌。因此值得检查Veeva Systems的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素要考虑。

big
NYSE:VEEV Earnings and Revenue Growth November 28th 2024
纽交所:veeva systems 2024年11月28日的收益和营收增长

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Veeva Systems. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.9% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.0% by the third-largest shareholder. Peter Gassner, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股份,董事会很可能需要关注他们的偏好。我们注意到对于veeva systems,对冲基金没有意义的投资。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是该公司最大的股东,持有8.9%的流通股。第二大股东持有约7.6%的流通股,紧随其后的是第三大股东持有6.0%的股份。第二大股东Peter Gassner还兼任首席执行官。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 19 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步调查,我们发现前19名股东在公司中拥有51%的综合所有权,这表明没有任何单一股东对公司具有重大控制权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Veeva Systems

Veeva Systems的内部股权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Veeva Systems Inc.. Insiders own US$3.0b worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以看到内部持有Veeva Systems Inc.的股份。 内部持有的股份价值30亿美元(按当前价格计算)。 大多数人会说这表明股东和董事会之间利益一致。 但还是值得检查一下那些内部人士是否一直在卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众,包括零售投资者,拥有公司的10%股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然这种所有权的规模可能不足以在其方面左右政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Veeva Systems better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Veeva Systems that you should be aware of.

考虑到拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地了解veeva systems,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经发现veeva systems有1个警示标志,你应该注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发