share_log

We Think Maximus (NYSE:MMS) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt

We Think Maximus (NYSE:MMS) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt

我们认为马克西姆斯服务(纽交所:MMS)可以自如应对其债务
Simply Wall St ·  11/28 07:39

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Maximus, Inc. (NYSE:MMS) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

沃伦·巴菲特曾 famously 说过,‘波动性远非风险的同义词。’当我们思考一家公司有多大风险时,我们总是喜欢关注它的债务使用,因为债务过重可能导致毁灭。重要的是,马克西姆斯服务(纽交所:MMS)确实承担了债务。但是,股东应该担心它的债务使用吗?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

债务何时有危险?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

当一家企业无法轻松履行这些义务时,债务和其他负债就会变得风险巨大,无论是通过自由现金流还是以有吸引力的价格筹集资金。在最坏的情况下,如果公司无法偿还债权人,可能会破产。然而,更常见(但仍然代价高昂)的情况是,公司必须以低价稀释股东,以便仅仅是为了控制债务。当然,许多公司使用债务来资助增长,而没有任何负面影响。当我们考虑公司的债务使用时,我们首先将现金和债务结合在一起。

How Much Debt Does Maximus Carry?

马克西姆斯服务的债务有多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Maximus had US$1.14b of debt in September 2024, down from US$1.25b, one year before. However, it also had US$183.1m in cash, and so its net debt is US$952.4m.

您可以点击下面的图表查看历史数据,但它显示在2024年9月,马克西姆斯服务的债务为11.4亿美金,较一年前的12.5亿美金有所下降。然而,它也有18310万美金的现金,因此其净债务为95240万美金。

big
NYSE:MMS Debt to Equity History November 28th 2024
纽交所:MMS 债务与股本历史 2024年11月28日

How Strong Is Maximus' Balance Sheet?

马克西姆斯的资产负债表有多强?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Maximus had liabilities of US$807.5m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.48b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$183.1m and US$884.8m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.22b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

仔细查看最新的资产负债表数据,我们可以看到马克西姆斯在12个月内有80750万美元的负债,超过12个月的负债为14.8亿美元。另一方面,它有18310万美元的现金和88480万美元的应收账款将在一年内到期。因此,它的负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款之和高出12.2亿美元。

Maximus has a market capitalization of US$4.40b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

马克西姆斯的市值为44亿美元,因此如果需要,它很可能可以筹集现金以改善其资产负债表。但是我们绝对希望关注其债务带来过多风险的迹象。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我们通过将公司的净债务与其息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)相除,并计算其息税前利润(EBIT)如何覆盖其利息费用(利息覆盖率)来衡量公司的债务负担相对于其盈利能力。因此,我们同时考虑债务的绝对数量以及所支付的利率。

Maximus has net debt worth 1.6 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 6.0 times the interest expense. While these numbers do not alarm us, it's worth noting that the cost of the company's debt is having a real impact. Importantly, Maximus grew its EBIT by 52% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Maximus's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

马克西姆斯的净债务约为EBITDA的1.6倍,这并不算多,但它的利息覆盖率看起来有点低,EBIT仅为利息支出的6.0倍。虽然这些数字并未让我们感到惊慌,但值得注意的是,公司债务的成本正在产生实际影响。重要的是,马克西姆斯在过去的12个月中将其EBIT增长了52%,这一增长将使其更容易应对债务。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是一个好的起点。但未来的收益,尤其是将决定马克西姆斯维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的看法,你可能会觉得这份关于分析师利润预期的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Maximus recorded free cash flow worth 74% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最后,虽然税务机关可能喜爱会计利润,但贷方只接受冷硬现金。因此,合理的步骤是查看EBIT与实际自由现金流匹配的比例。在最近三年中,马克西姆斯录得自由现金流占EBIT的74%,考虑到自由现金流不包括利息和税,这大约是正常的。这一自由现金流使公司在适当的时候能够偿还债务。

Our View

我们的观点

Happily, Maximus's impressive EBIT growth rate implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think Maximus's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Maximus that you should be aware of.

令人欣慰的是,马克西姆斯令人印象深刻的EBIT增长率意味着它在债务方面占据优势。而且,这一好消息并没有止步于此,因为它将EBIT转换为自由现金流的能力也支持了这一印象!从更大的视角来看,我们认为马克西姆斯的债务使用相当合理,我们对此并不担心。毕竟,合理的杠杆可以提升股本回报。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中对债务的认识最为深刻。然而,并不是所有投资风险都存在于资产负债表中——远不止于此。例如,我们已经为马克西姆斯识别出了一个你应该注意的警告信号。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

每天结束时,通常更好地关注那些没有净债务的公司。您可以查看我们特别名单上的这些公司(所有这些公司都有盈利增长记录)。这是免费的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发