OceanFirst Financial Corp.'s (NASDAQ:OCFC) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.3% Over Last Week
OceanFirst Financial Corp.'s (NASDAQ:OCFC) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.3% Over Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, OceanFirst Financial's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 考虑到机构在股票中的大额持有,oceanfirst financial的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 共有17名投资者拥有该公司50%的股权
- 最近由内部人士出售。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (NASDAQ:OCFC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 74% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制了oceanfirst financial corp.(纳斯达克:OCFC),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。机构持有74%的股份,拥有公司最多的股票。从另一个角度来看,该集团面临最大的上涨潜力(或下行风险)。
And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 4.3% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 56% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
因此,机构投资者在公司股票价格上周上涨4.3%后获得了最多的收益。目前一年的投资回报率为56%,而上周的涨幅无疑是受欢迎的。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of OceanFirst Financial.
在下面的图表中,我们详细分析了 oceanfirst financial 的不同持股群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About OceanFirst Financial?
机构持股告诉我们关于 oceanfirst financial 什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
OceanFirst Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of OceanFirst Financial, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
oceanfirst financial 已经在股东名册上有机构投资者。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经审视了该股票,并且他们喜欢它。但和其他任何人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果两个大型机构投资者同时尝试卖出某只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,查看 oceanfirst financial 过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,需牢记,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in OceanFirst Financial. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.9% and 5.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Christopher Maher directly holds 0.6% of the total shares outstanding.
由于机构投资者持有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。对 oceanfirst financial 来说,对冲基金的股份不多。贝莱德公司目前是最大的股东,持有14%的流通股。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有5.9%和5.4%的流通股。此外,该公司的首席执行官克里斯托弗·马赫直接持有总流通股的0.6%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们拥有的所有权数据的更深入研究表明,前17大股东共拥有50%的股权,这意味着没有任何一个单一股东拥有多数股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of OceanFirst Financial
oceanfirst financial 的内部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in OceanFirst Financial Corp.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$44m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股东们可能会对知道内部人士在 oceanfirst financial corp 拥有股份感兴趣。内部人士持有价值4400万美金的实质性股份。大多数人认为这是一个真正的积极信号。大多数人会说这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。尽管如此,查看这些内部人士是否有在卖出股份也可能是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in OceanFirst Financial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众,即通常的个人投资者,持有 oceanfirst financial 23%的股份。尽管这一所有权规模相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand OceanFirst Financial better, we need to consider many other factors.
考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但是为了更好地理解oceanfirst financial,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜欢更深入地了解公司过去的表现。您可以在以下详细图表中找到历史收益和收入。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。