share_log

We Think You Can Look Beyond Vestis' (NYSE:VSTS) Lackluster Earnings

We Think You Can Look Beyond Vestis' (NYSE:VSTS) Lackluster Earnings

我们认为你可以超越Vestis(纽交所:VSTS)平淡的盈利表现。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/29 18:45

Vestis Corporation's (NYSE:VSTS) stock was strong despite it releasing a soft earnings report last week. We think that investors might be looking at some positive factors beyond the earnings numbers.

尽管Vestis Corporation(纽交所:VSTS)上周发布了疲软的盈利报告,其股票表现依然强劲。我们认为投资者可能在盈利数字之外看到了一些积极因素。

big
NYSE:VSTS Earnings and Revenue History November 29th 2024
纽交所:VSTS的盈利和营业收入历史 2024年11月29日

A Closer Look At Vestis' Earnings

深入分析Vestis的盈利情况

Many investors haven't heard of the accrual ratio from cashflow, but it is actually a useful measure of how well a company's profit is backed up by free cash flow (FCF) during a given period. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

许多投资者没有听说过现金流的应计比率,但它实际上是一个有用的衡量公司利润在一个给定期间内被自由现金流(FCF)支持的度量衡。为了得到应计比率,我们首先需要在一个期间内将FCF从利润中减去,然后将该数额除以该期间平均营运资产。您可以认为现金流应计比率是“非FCF盈利比率”。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

这意味着负责任的比率为好事,因为它表明公司所带来的自由现金流比利润所表明的要多。这并不是要暗示我们应该担心正的负责任率,但值得注意的是,在负责任比率相当高的地方有一些学术证据表明,负责任比率高是近期利润的一个不好的征兆。

Vestis has an accrual ratio of -0.17 for the year to September 2024. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. To wit, it produced free cash flow of US$393m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of US$21.0m. Vestis' free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see.

截至2024年9月,Vestis的应计比率为-0.17。因此,其法定盈利明显低于其自由现金流。换句话说,它在此期间生成了39300万美元的自由现金流,远超其报告的2100万美元盈利。Vestis的自由现金流在过去一年中有所改善,这通常是一个好兆头。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让您想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看基于其估计的未来盈利能力的互动图表。

Our Take On Vestis' Profit Performance

我们对Vestis利润表现的看法

As we discussed above, Vestis' accrual ratio indicates strong conversion of profit to free cash flow, which is a positive for the company. Based on this observation, we consider it possible that Vestis' statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! Unfortunately, though, its earnings per share actually fell back over the last year. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. Keep in mind, when it comes to analysing a stock it's worth noting the risks involved. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Vestis (1 is concerning) you should be familiar with.

正如我们上面讨论的,Vestis的会计比率表明其利润转化为自由现金流的能力强,这对公司来说是个好消息。根据这一观察,我们认为Vestis的法定利润可能低估了其盈利潜力!不幸的是,其每股收益在过去一年中实际上有所下降。本文的目标是评估我们在多大程度上可以依赖法定收益来反映公司的潜力,但还有很多其他因素需要考虑。请记住,在分析股票时,值得注意的是相关的风险。例如,我们已经确定了Vestis的2个警告信号(其中1个令人担忧),你应该了解这些情况。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Vestis' profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

此报道仅关注于一个因素,该因素揭示了Vestis利润的性质。但如果你能够专注于细节,总有更多发现。一些人认为高股本回报率是优质业务的良好标志。因此你可能希望查看这个免费的高股本回报率公司的集合,或是这个拥有高内部持股的股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发