Retail Investors Among Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd.'s (HKG:2869) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 4.9% Last Week
Retail Investors Among Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd.'s (HKG:2869) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 4.9% Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Greentown Service Group's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Insiders own 16% of Greentown Service Group
- 绿城服务集团的主要零售投资者股权表明,关键决策受到公众股东的影响。
- 共有3位投资者占公司的多数股权,拥有52%的所有权。
- 内部人士拥有绿城服务集团16%股份。
If you want to know who really controls Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKG:2869), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 34% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道谁真正控制了绿城服务集团有限公司(HKG:2869),那么你需要查看其股份登记的组成。零售投资者持有34%的股份,是公司中拥有最多股份的投资者。换句话说,该集团在对公司的投资中获得最大收益(或承受最大损失)。
As a result, retail investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 4.9% gain.
因此,散户投资者是上周4.9%涨幅的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Greentown Service Group.
在下面的图表中,我们深入分析了绿城服务集团不同的持股群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Greentown Service Group?
机构持股对我们了解绿城服务集团有什么启示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Greentown Service Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Greentown Service Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
绿城服务集团的股票登记上已经有机构的身影。实际上,他们在公司的股份相当可观。这表明专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果两家大型机构投资者试图同时出售某只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得查看绿城服务集团过去的盈利轨迹(如下所示)。当然,还需要考虑其他因素。
It would appear that 5.2% of Greentown Service Group shares are controlled by hedge funds. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is Orchid Garden Investment Company Limited, with ownership of 32%. With 14% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Hairong Li and Yiheng Capital Management, L.P. are the second and third largest shareholders.
看起来5.2%的绿城服务集团股份被对冲基金控制。这引起了我的注意,因为对冲基金有时试图影响管理层,或带来能够为股东创造短期价值的变化。公司最大股东是兰花园投资有限公司,拥有32%的股份。与此相对应的,李海容和宜恒资本管理有限公司分别持有14%和5.2%的股份,是第二和第三大股东。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
经过更深入的挖掘,我们发现前3大股东共控制了公司股份的一半以上,这意味着他们有相当大的权力来影响公司的决策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Greentown Service Group
绿城服务集团的内部股权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful HK$2.0b stake in this HK$12b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
内部人士似乎拥有了Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. 重要的股份。很有趣的是,内部人士在这个120亿港元的业务中拥有20亿港元的利益。看到这种投资水平是件好事。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士是否最近有买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Greentown Service Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众以34%的持股比例,对Greentown Service Group拥有一定的影响力。这种持股比例虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能无法改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 32%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们可以看到,私营公司持有已发行股份的32%。从这个事实中很难得出任何结论,所以值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时内部人员或其他关联方通过单独的私营公司持有公共公司股票的利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Greentown Service Group that you should be aware of before investing here.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是很重要的,但还有其他更重要的因素。举例来说,我们发现了 Greentown Service Group 的一个警告信号,在你投资之前你需要注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。