Returns On Capital At Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) Have Stalled
Returns On Capital At Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) Have Stalled
What trends should we look for it we want to identify stocks that can multiply in value over the long term? Ideally, a business will show two trends; firstly a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an increasing amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. With that in mind, the ROCE of Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) looks decent, right now, so lets see what the trend of returns can tell us.
如果我们想要识别能在长期内翻倍价值的股票,应该关注哪些趋势?理想情况下,一家企业会显示出两个趋势;首先是投入资本回报率(ROCE)的增长,其次是投入资本的增加。如果你看到这一点,通常意味着这是一家拥有良好商业模式和大量盈利再投资机会的公司。考虑到这一点,普雷克萨斯(纳斯达克:PLXS)的ROCE目前看起来不错,让我们看看收益的趋势能告诉我们些什么。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
上面您可以看到蒙托克可再生能源现行ROCE与之前资本回报的比较,但过去只能知道这么多。如果您感兴趣,可以查看我们免费的蒙托克可再生能源分析师报告,了解分析师的预测。
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for Plexus, this is the formula:
对于那些不确定ROCE是什么意思的人来说,它衡量的是公司从其业务中使用的资本所能产生的税前利润的金额。要计算普雷克萨斯的这个指标,公式如下:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
资本利用率 = 利息和税前利润(EBIT) ÷ (总资产 - 流动负债)
0.12 = US$188m ÷ (US$3.2b - US$1.6b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.12 = 18800万美元 ÷ (32亿美元 - 16亿美元) (基于截至2024年9月的过去12个月数据)。
So, Plexus has an ROCE of 12%. In absolute terms, that's a satisfactory return, but compared to the Electronic industry average of 10% it's much better.
因此,普雷克萨斯的ROCE为12%。从绝对值来看,这个回报是令人满意的,但与电子行业平均水平10%相比,还是要好很多。
In the above chart we have measured Plexus' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for Plexus .
在上述图表中,我们对普雷克萨斯之前的资本回报率与其之前的表现进行了衡量,但未来可以说更为重要。如果您感兴趣,可以查看我们为普雷克萨斯提供的免费分析师报告中的分析师预测。
What Does the ROCE Trend For Plexus Tell Us?
普雷克萨斯的资本回报率趋势告诉我们什么?
While the returns on capital are good, they haven't moved much. The company has consistently earned 12% for the last five years, and the capital employed within the business has risen 33% in that time. 12% is a pretty standard return, and it provides some comfort knowing that Plexus has consistently earned this amount. Stable returns in this ballpark can be unexciting, but if they can be maintained over the long run, they often provide nice rewards to shareholders.
虽然资本回报率不错,但变化不大。这家公司在过去五年中一直稳定地赚取12%的回报,而在此期间,企业使用的资本增加了33%。12%的回报率相对标准,知道普雷克萨斯一直保持这样的收益让人感到安心。在这个范围内稳定的回报可能乏味,但如果能够在长时间内维持,通常会给股东带来可观的回报。
Another thing to note, Plexus has a high ratio of current liabilities to total assets of 52%. This can bring about some risks because the company is basically operating with a rather large reliance on its suppliers or other sorts of short-term creditors. Ideally we'd like to see this reduce as that would mean fewer obligations bearing risks.
另一个需要注意的事情是,普雷克萨斯的流动负债与总资产的比率高达52%。这可能带来一些风险,因为公司基本上在相当依赖供应商或其他短期债权人的情况下运营。理想情况下,我们希望看到这一比例降低,因为这意味着会有更少的担风险的负债。
The Bottom Line
最终结论
In the end, Plexus has proven its ability to adequately reinvest capital at good rates of return. And the stock has done incredibly well with a 112% return over the last five years, so long term investors are no doubt ecstatic with that result. So even though the stock might be more "expensive" than it was before, we think the strong fundamentals warrant this stock for further research.
总的来说,普雷克萨斯已经证明其能够以良好的回报率充分再投资资本。而且该股票在过去五年中表现非常好,回报达到了112%,所以长期投资者无疑对这一结果感到欢欣。因此,即使该股票可能比之前"昂贵",我们认为强劲的基本面仍使得该股票值得进一步研究。
Like most companies, Plexus does come with some risks, and we've found 1 warning sign that you should be aware of.
与大多数公司一样,普雷克萨斯也存在一些风险,我们发现了一个你应该注意的警告信号。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果您想寻找财务状况良好、回报卓越的实力强企业,可以免费查看以下公司列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。