Is Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) Using Too Much Debt?
Is Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) Using Too Much Debt?
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE:IR) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
传奇基金经理李录(查理·芒格支持)曾经说过,'最大的投资风险并非价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受永久性资本损失。' 当你检查一个公司的风险性时,考虑其资产负债表是很自然的,因为债务在业务崩溃时往往扮演重要角色。 英格索兰公司(纽交所:IR)确实存在负债。 但真正的问题是,这些负债是否让公司变得风险更高。
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
债务帮助企业,直到企业不得不用新资本或自由现金流偿还债务为止。最终,如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法定义务,股东可能什么都得不到。然而,更常见(但仍然代价高昂)的情况是,公司必须以低于市价的价格发行股票,从而永久稀释股东,以补充其资产负债表。当然,很多公司利用债务来支持增长,而没有任何负面后果。当我们审查债务水平时,我们首先考虑现金和债务水平。
How Much Debt Does Ingersoll Rand Carry?
英格索兰承载多少债务?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at September 2024 Ingersoll Rand had debt of US$4.81b, up from US$2.75b in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$1.38b, its net debt is less, at about US$3.44b.
下方图片显示,你可以点击查看更详细信息,显示2024年9月,英格索兰的债务为48.1亿美元,比一年前的27.5亿美元有所增长。 不过,由于其拥有13.8亿美元的现金储备,其净债务较少,约为34.4亿美元。
How Healthy Is Ingersoll Rand's Balance Sheet?
英格索兰的资产负债表有多健康?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Ingersoll Rand had liabilities of US$1.78b due within a year, and liabilities of US$6.10b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$1.38b as well as receivables valued at US$1.48b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$5.02b.
最新的资产负债表数据显示,英格索兰短期内到期的负债为17.8亿美元,之后到期的负债为61亿美元。 抵消这些义务,它拥有13.8亿美元的现金以及价值14.8亿美元的应收账款在未来12个月内到期。 因此,其负债大于其现金和(短期)应收账款的总和为50.2亿美元。
Given Ingersoll Rand has a humongous market capitalization of US$42.0b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.
鉴于英格索兰目前市值高达420亿美元,很难相信这些负债会构成很大威胁。 话虽如此,显然我们应继续监视其资产负债表,以防恶化。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我们通过查看净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比以及计算其利息支出由收益前利息和税(EBIT)覆盖的程度来度量一家公司的债务负载相对于其收益能力的程度。此方法的优点在于我们同时考虑了债务的绝对量(以净债务为EBITDA)以及与该债务相关的实际利息支出(以其利息覆盖倍数计算)。
With a debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.8, Ingersoll Rand uses debt artfully but responsibly. And the alluring interest cover (EBIT of 7.5 times interest expense) certainly does not do anything to dispel this impression. Also relevant is that Ingersoll Rand has grown its EBIT by a very respectable 22% in the last year, thus enhancing its ability to pay down debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Ingersoll Rand can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
以1.8的债务与息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)比率来看,英格索兰债务利用得巧妙而负责。 令人着迷的利息覆盖(EBIt为利息支出的7.5倍)确实没有什么能打破这种印象。 同样重要的是,英格索兰在过去一年内将其EBIt增长了22%,从而增强了偿还债务的能力。 毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表上了解到的关于债务的情况最为重要。 但最终业务的未来盈利能力将决定英格索兰是否能够随着时间加强其资产负债表。 因此,如果您关注未来,可以查看这份显示分析师利润预测的免费报告。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Ingersoll Rand generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 90% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.
但我们最后考虑的也很重要,因为一家公司无法用名义利润支付债务;它需要真金白银。 因此,逻辑的步骤是查看EBIt中实际自由现金流所占比例。 在过去三年中,英格索兰产生的自由现金流相当可观,相当于其EBIt的90%,超出我们的预期。 这使其有能力偿还债务,如果有必要的话。
Our View
我们的观点
Happily, Ingersoll Rand's impressive conversion of EBIT to free cash flow implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its EBIT growth rate also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think Ingersoll Rand's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. We'd be motivated to research the stock further if we found out that Ingersoll Rand insiders have bought shares recently. If you would too, then you're in luck, since today we're sharing our list of reported insider transactions for free.
幸运的是,英格索兰将EBIt转换为自由现金流的出色表现意味着它在债务方面占据上风。而好消息并不止于此,因为它的EBIt增长率也支持这种印象!从更大的角度来看,我们认为英格索兰运用债务的方式相当合理,我们对此并不担心。毕竟,明智的杠杆可以提高股本回报率。如果我们发现英格索兰内部人士最近买入股份,我们会积极展开进一步的研究。如果你也有这样的发现,那你很幸运,因为今天我们免费分享了我们报告的内部交易名单。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有兴趣投资能够在不负债的情况下增长利润的企业,请查看这份免费列表,其中列出了在资产负债表上拥有净现金的成长型企业。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。