PTC (NASDAQ:PTC) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
PTC (NASDAQ:PTC) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, PTC Inc. (NASDAQ:PTC) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
传奇基金经理李禄(查理·芒格支持的)曾说过:“最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受资本的永久损失。”因此,当你考虑任何给定股票的风险时,显然需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务可能会使公司陷入困境。重要的是,ptc inc(纳斯达克:PTC)确实有债务。但真正的问题是,这些债务是否使公司变得风险高。
When Is Debt A Problem?
什么时候负债才是一个问题?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
债务在企业在有新资本或自由现金流的支持下,可以协助企业。但如果公司不能履行偿还债务的法定义务,则股东可能一无所获。然而,较为常见(但仍然痛苦的)情况是以低价筹集新股本,从而永久稀释股东。话虽如此,最常见的情况是企业合理地管理其债务,使其对其自身具有优势。当我们审查债务水平时,我们首先要考虑现金和债务水平。
How Much Debt Does PTC Carry?
PTC承载了多少债务?
As you can see below, PTC had US$1.75b of debt, at September 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had US$265.8m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.48b.
正如下方所示,截至2024年9月,ptc inc的债务为17.5亿美元,和去年差不多。您可以点击图表获取更多细节。 然而,它还有26580万美元的现金,因此其净债务为14.8亿美元。

How Healthy Is PTC's Balance Sheet?
PTC的资产负债表健康吗?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that PTC had liabilities of US$1.67b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.50b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$265.8m as well as receivables valued at US$876.4m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$2.03b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
深入查看最新的资产负债表数据,我们可以看到,PTC有16.7亿美元的负债将在12个月内到期,以及15亿美元的负债将在更长时间后到期。通过这些义务,它拥有26580万美元的现金以及12个月内到期的应收账款87640万美元。因此,它的负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款多出20.3亿美元。
Given PTC has a humongous market capitalization of US$24.0b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.
鉴于PTC拥有240亿美元的巨额市值,难以相信这些负债会造成太大威胁。尽管如此,显然我们应该继续关注其资产负债表,以免情况变得更糟。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我们通过将公司的净债务与其息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)相除,并计算其息税前利润(EBIT)如何覆盖其利息费用(利息覆盖率)来衡量公司的债务负担相对于其盈利能力。因此,我们同时考虑债务的绝对数量以及所支付的利率。
PTC has net debt worth 2.2 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 5.1 times the interest expense. While these numbers do not alarm us, it's worth noting that the cost of the company's debt is having a real impact. We note that PTC grew its EBIT by 24% in the last year, and that should make it easier to pay down debt, going forward. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine PTC's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
PTC的净债务是EBITDA的2.2倍,这并不算太多,但其利息保障率看起来有点低,EBIT仅为利息支出的5.1倍。虽然这些数字并没有令我们感到恐慌,但值得注意的是,公司的债务成本正在产生实际影响。我们注意到,PTC在过去一年中将EBIT增长了24%,这应该会使支付债务变得更容易。分析债务时,资产负债表显然是重点关注的领域。但未来的收益,尤其是,将决定PTC维持健康资产负债表的能力。所以如果你关注未来,可以查看这个免费的报告,显示分析师的利润预测。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, PTC actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash conversion gets us as excited as the crowd when the beat drops at a Daft Punk concert.
最后,一家公司只能用冷硬现金偿还债务,而不是会计利润。因此,合乎逻辑的步骤是查看EBIT中实际自由现金流所匹配的比例。在过去三年中,PTC实际上产生的自由现金流超过了EBIT。这种强劲的现金转化让我们和大众在Daft Punk音乐会开场时一样兴奋。
Our View
我们的观点
Happily, PTC's impressive conversion of EBIT to free cash flow implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its EBIT growth rate also supports that impression! Zooming out, PTC seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for PTC that you should be aware of.
值得高兴的是,ptc将EBIt转换为自由现金流的出色表现意味着它在债务上占有优势。而且好消息不止于此,它的EBIt增长率也支持了这一印象!放眼更广,ptc似乎合理地使用债务;这也得到了我们的认可。虽然债务确实带来风险,但如果使用得当,它也可以带来更高的股本回报。在分析债务时,资产负债表显然是要关注的领域。然而,投资风险并不全部存在于资产负债表中——远非如此。例如,我们已经识别出1个关于ptc的警示信号,你应该注意。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
当一切尘埃落定时,有时更容易专注于那些甚至不需要债务的公司。读者可以立即免费查看零净债务的成长股列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。