Return Trends At Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) Aren't Appealing
Return Trends At Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) Aren't Appealing
There are a few key trends to look for if we want to identify the next multi-bagger. Firstly, we'd want to identify a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and then alongside that, an ever-increasing base of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. In light of that, when we looked at Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) and its ROCE trend, we weren't exactly thrilled.
如果我们想确定下一个多倍投资标的,有几个关键趋势需要关注。首先,我们需要识别一个不断增长的资本回报率(ROCE),同时还要有一个不断增加的资本基础。如果你看到这一点,通常意味着这是一家具有出色商业模式和充足盈利再投资机会的公司。因此,当我们查看安德玛(纽交所:UAA)及其ROCE趋势时,我们并没有感到特别兴奋。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
我们对 Enphase Energy 的资本雇用回报率的看法:正如我们上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的资本回报率没有提高,但它正在重新投资于业务。投资者必须认为未来会有更好的前景,因为股票表现良好,使持股五年以上的股东获得了 690% 的收益。最终,如果基本趋势持续存在,我们不会对它成为一只多头股持有期很久很有信心。
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on Under Armour is:
对于那些不知道的人来说,ROCE是衡量公司年度税前利润(即回报)相对于业务中所使用资本的一个指标。安德玛的计算公式为:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
资本利用率 = 利息和税前利润(EBIT) ÷ (总资产 - 流动负债)
0.067 = US$221m ÷ (US$4.5b - US$1.2b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.067 = 22100万美元 ÷ (45亿美元 - 12亿) (根据截至2024年9月的最近十二个月数据)。
So, Under Armour has an ROCE of 6.7%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Luxury industry average of 13%.
因此,安德玛的资本回报率为6.7%。从绝对值来看,这是一个较低的回报,它也低于奢侈行业的平均水平13%。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for Under Armour compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Under Armour for free.
上面您可以看到Under Armour当前的资本回报率(ROCE)与其过去的资本回报相比,但过去的情况只能告诉我们这么多。如果您愿意,可以免费查看分析师对Under Armour的预测。
So How Is Under Armour's ROCE Trending?
那么Under Armour的ROCE趋势如何?
Over the past five years, Under Armour's ROCE and capital employed have both remained mostly flat. Businesses with these traits tend to be mature and steady operations because they're past the growth phase. So unless we see a substantial change at Under Armour in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger.
在过去五年中,Under Armour的ROCE和所用资本都基本保持平稳。拥有这些特征的企业往往是成熟且稳定的运营,因为它们已过了增长阶段。因此,除非我们看到Under Armour在ROCE和额外投资方面有实质性的变化,否则我们不会对其成为多倍收益股抱有过多期待。
What We Can Learn From Under Armour's ROCE
我们可以从Under Armour的ROCE中学到什么
In a nutshell, Under Armour has been trudging along with the same returns from the same amount of capital over the last five years. And in the last five years, the stock has given away 47% so the market doesn't look too hopeful on these trends strengthening any time soon. All in all, the inherent trends aren't typical of multi-baggers, so if that's what you're after, we think you might have more luck elsewhere.
简而言之,Under Armour在过去五年中以相同的资本获得相同的回报。并且在过去五年中,股票下跌了47%,因此市场对这些趋势在短期内加强并不太乐观。总体而言,这些内在趋势并不典型于多倍收益股,因此,如果您在寻找这种机会,我们认为您可能在其他地方会更有运气。
If you want to continue researching Under Armour, you might be interested to know about the 1 warning sign that our analysis has discovered.
如果您想继续研究Under Armour,您可能会对我们分析发现的一个警告信号感兴趣。
For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.
对于喜欢投资稳健公司的人,请查看这份具有稳健资产负债表和高权益回报的公司免费列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。