Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After Guizhou Gas Group Corporation Ltd.'s (SHSE:600903) Market Cap Dropped by CN¥506m
Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After Guizhou Gas Group Corporation Ltd.'s (SHSE:600903) Market Cap Dropped by CN¥506m
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in Guizhou Gas Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Institutions own 23% of Guizhou Gas Group
- 私人公司在贵州燃气集团拥有相当大的所有权,这表明它们共同在管理和业务策略上拥有更大的发言权
- 共有2位投资者拥有江苏长青新材料科技51%的所有权。
- 机构拥有贵州燃气集团23%的股份
Every investor in Guizhou Gas Group Corporation Ltd. (SHSE:600903) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位贵州燃气集团有限公司(SHSE:600903)的投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到私人公司拥有公司51%的所有权,换句话说,该集团将最有可能从他们对公司的投资中获得最多(或者损失最多)。
While the holdings of private companies took a hit after last week's 5.1% price drop, institutions with their 23% holdings also suffered.
上周股价下跌5.1%后,私人公司持有的股份受到打击,持有23%股份的机构也遭受损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Guizhou Gas Group.
让我们更仔细地看看,不同类型的股东可以告诉我们有关贵州燃气集团的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guizhou Gas Group?
机构所有权告诉我们关于贵州燃气集团的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Guizhou Gas Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Guizhou Gas Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所见,机构投资者在贵州燃气集团中持有相当大的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中有一定的信誉度。然而,最好谨慎依赖于所谓的机构投资者带来的验证。它们有时也会出错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,总存在它们在'拥挤交易'中的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能竞相快速抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到贵州燃气集团的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事并不仅限于此。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Guizhou Gas Group. Guizhou Wujiang Energy Group Co., Ltd is currently the company's largest shareholder with 30% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 21% and 20% of the stock.
我们注意到,对于贵州燃气集团,对冲基金没有意义的投资。 贵州乌江能源集团有限公司目前是该公司最大的股东,持有30%的股份。 相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约21%和20%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。分析师观点也可以达到相同的目的。我们的信息表明,这只股票没有任何分析师覆盖,所以它可能不是很出名。
Insider Ownership Of Guizhou Gas Group
贵州燃气集团的内部持股权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Guizhou Gas Group Corporation Ltd.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth CN¥416m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
最近的数据显示,贵州燃气集团有限公司的内部持股一些股份。内部持股价值41600万人民币,这对大多数人来说都是一个积极的信号。看到内部人员进行这种水平的投资是件好事。您可以在这里查看内部人员最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in Guizhou Gas Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在贵州燃气集团持有22%的股份。虽然这种持股规模可能还不足以左右政策决定向他们的有利方向发展,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 51%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据显示,私有公司持有该公司51%的股份。从这件事情中很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究拥有这些私人公司的人。有时内部人士或其他相关方可能通过单独的私营公司拥有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Guizhou Gas Group you should be aware of, and 2 of them are significant.
我发现查看一家公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。举个例子:我们发现了贵州燃气存在3个警示信号,您应该注意,其中有2个非常重要。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。