Should You Be Impressed By BlackLine, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BL) ROE?
Should You Be Impressed By BlackLine, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BL) ROE?
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). By way of learning-by-doing, we'll look at ROE to gain a better understanding of BlackLine, Inc. (NASDAQ:BL).
许多投资者仍在了解有用于分析股票的各种指标。本文是为那些想了解roe的人编写的。通过实践学习,我们将研究roe以更好地了解黑线公司(纳斯达克:blackline)。
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.
净资产收益率或roe是用来评估公司管理层如何有效利用公司资本的关键指标。简而言之,roe显示了每一美元投资在股东投资方面产生的利润。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
如何计算净资产收益率?
ROE can be calculated by using the formula:
roe可以通过以下公式计算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
净资产收益率 = 净利润(来自持续经营) ÷ 股东权益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for BlackLine is:
根据上述公式,黑线公司的roe为:
32% = US$129m ÷ US$398m (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
32% = 12900万美元 ÷ 39800万美元(基于截至2024年9月的过去十二个月)。
The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.32 in profit.
‘回报’是企业过去一年赚取的收入。概念化的一种方式是,对于每美元股东资本,公司赚取了0.32美元的利润。
Does BlackLine Have A Good Return On Equity?
BlackLine的roe表现良好吗?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. As you can see in the graphic below, BlackLine has a higher ROE than the average (12%) in the Software industry.
通过将公司的roe与行业平均值进行比较,我们可以快速衡量其表现如何。重要的是,这远非完美的衡量标准,因为在相同行业分类中公司之间存在显著差异。正如您在下图中所看到的,BlackLine在软件行业的roe高于平均值(12%)。
That's clearly a positive. However, bear in mind that a high ROE doesn't necessarily indicate efficient profit generation. Especially when a firm uses high levels of debt to finance its debt which may boost its ROE but the high leverage puts the company at risk. Our risks dashboardshould have the 2 risks we have identified for BlackLine.
显然是积极的。不过,请记住,高roe并不一定表示高效的利润生成。特别是当公司使用高比例的债务来融资债务时,这可能会提高其roe,但是高杠杆会让公司面临风险。我们的风险仪表板应该包含我们为BlackLine确定的两个风险。
The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity
债务对股本回报率的重要性
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
大多数公司需要通过某种方式获得资金来增加利润。这笔资金可以来自留存收益、发行新股(权益)或债务。在前两种选项的情况下,roe将反映出这种现金的使用情况,以支持增长。在后一种情况下,用于增长的债务将改善回报率,但不会影响总权益。这将使roe看起来比没有使用债务时要好。
BlackLine's Debt And Its 32% ROE
黑线的债务及其32%的roe
It's worth noting the high use of debt by BlackLine, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 2.24. Its ROE is pretty impressive but, it would have probably been lower without the use of debt. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.
值得注意的是黑线对债务的高度利用,导致其资产负债比达到2.24。其roe相当令人印象深刻,但如果没有债务的利用,它可能会更低。投资者应仔细考虑一家公司如果无法轻易借款可能会表现如何,因为信贷市场随时间而变化。
Summary
总结
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
对于比较不同业务质量的公司,ROE很有用。在我们的书中,最高质量的公司具有高ROE,尽管其债务较低。如果两家公司的债务与股本比例大致相同,并且其中一家公司的ROE更高,我通常更喜欢ROE更高的那家公司。
But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
但ROE只是一个更大难题的一部分,因为高质量的企业经常以高收益倍数交易。利润增长率与股票价格反映的预期之间的差异是需要特别考虑的。因此,我认为值得检查一下分析师为该公司预测的这份免费报告。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果您想查看另一家可能具有更好财务状况的公司 - 具有高股本回报率和低债务的公司,那么请不要错过这份有趣公司列表,该列表免费提供。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。