LendingClub Corporation's (NYSE:LC) Institutional Investors Lost 3.7% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
LendingClub Corporation's (NYSE:LC) Institutional Investors Lost 3.7% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies LendingClub's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 显著的高机构持股意味着lendingclub的股票价格对他们的交易行为敏感。
- 前16名股东持有该业务50%的股份。
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of LendingClub Corporation (NYSE:LC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 76% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制lendingclub公司(纽交所:LC),理解业务的所有权结构很重要。我们可以看到,机构在公司中拥有76%的股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这个集团将获得最大的利益(如果出现下跌,将遭受最大损失)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.7% in value last week. Still, the 137% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
没有股东喜欢在投资中亏损,特别是看到他们的持股份额在上周下跌了3.7%的机构投资者。尽管如此,137%的年回报率可能帮助他们减轻了整体损失。然而,他们应该警惕未来可能出现的进一步亏损。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of LendingClub, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究LendingClub的每一种股东,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About LendingClub?
机构持股量告诉我们关于LendingClub的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that LendingClub does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see LendingClub's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到lendingclub确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的一部分。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在它们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多个方可能会竞争快速出售股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看lendingclub的历史盈利和营业收入,但请注意,事情总是有更多的内幕。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in LendingClub. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.8% and 5.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Scott Sanborn, the CEO has 1.2% of the shares allocated to their name.
机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可以共同强烈影响董事会的决策。对冲基金在lendingclub的股份不多。先锋集团公司目前是最大的股东,拥有11%的流通股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有7.8%和5.7%的流通股份。此外,我们发现首席执行官Scott Sanborn拥有1.2%分配给他名下的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
我们的所有权数字显示,前16名股东的所有权总计占50%,这意味着没有单一股东占有多数。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of LendingClub
LendingClub的内部持股权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in LendingClub Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$54m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们可以看到内部人士持有lendingclub公司的股票。内部人士的持股价值达5400万美元。大多数人会把这视为一个真正的积极信号。看到内部人士有这样的投资是好事。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否有买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in LendingClub. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,持有lendingclub 21%的股份。虽然这个持股比例相当可观,但如果这个决定与其他大股东不同,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - LendingClub has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我觉得了解到底谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是要真正获得洞见,我们还需要考虑其他信息。举个例子,风险 - lendingclub 有 1 个警告信号,我们认为你应该注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。